Funds empty their clips as Sudan divides

As Sudan divides into north and south, CalPERS and other UN PRI funds are divesting shares in public companies in that country, while at the same time warning on the fragile peace and the precarious economy.

CalPERS, the US’s largest public pension fund with about $236 billion in market assets, now owns stock in only eight companies in Sudan and Iran, down from 47 companies five years ago. The amount invested has, accordingly, fallen from $2 billion to $160 million.

This sell-off has been in line with California’s divestment Acts, with Rob Feckner, CalPERS’ board president, saying the fund also would not make any new investments in the countries.

“The cost of continuing to hold the stock of these eight companies is greater than the value of divesting them,” he said.

Strong sanctions adopted last year by the US federal government, the UN and the EU prompted the withdrawal of several large multinational oil and energy companies from Sudan and Iran.

The 12 signatories, including CalPERS, to the Sudan Engagement Group (SEG) statement diplomatically urged oil companies such as CNPC/PetroChina, Sinopec, ONGC, and Petronas to do more “to address risks and opportunities associated with operating in Sudan”.

Sponsored Content

The statement congratulated companies such as Schlumberger, Total and Petrofac for their “balanced focus on economic purpose and social development in the region that, in the long run, should lead to greater benefits for all concerned”.

Shareowners could be a force for peace, said Doug Pearce, CEO/CIO of the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation (BC IMC), one of the members of the Sudan Engagement Group and a signatory to the statement.

“Shareowners can be instrumental in using our investment capital to be a positive force for human rights, community development and economic growth in Sudan,” he said.

The SEG statement was signed by 12 investors with $2.7 trillion in assets under management: APG, Aviva Investors, BCIMC, CalPERS, Hermes Equity Ownership Services, Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, Mn Services, New Zealand Superannuation Fund, PGGM Investments, Robeco, The Co-operative Asset Management, and Universities Superannuation Scheme.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous