Equity risk nears 90 per cent at CalPERS

Analysis of CalPERS’ total portfolio, where equity risk accounts for nearly 90 per cent of the risk allocation and yet the asset allocation to global equities and alternative investments is about 67 per cent, corroborates the trend towards allocating assets according to risk, not asset buckets.

In its quarterly risk report, to the end of December 2010, the fund outlines the “most significant risk” in the CalPERS asset allocation is the equity risk estimated to be nearly 90 per cent total risk.

“The combination of geopolitical instability, rising commodity prices, and inflationary pressure have the potential to negatively impact the improved growth trends and recent equity rally…. Lower growth and inflation will have material impact on returns as they affect equity performance.”

The projected volatility to CalPERS’ total portfolio, as at December 31, 2010, is 15.2 per cent, with policy risk (at 13.8 per cent) significantly larger than the total fund tracking error.

Policy risk refers to the risk in the policy benchmark, while the total fund tracking error is the expected volatility of active returns between the total fund and the policy benchmark, currently forecast to be 2.39 per cent. This is above the total risk budget of 1.5 per cent

Of the total fund tracking error the allocation from asset allocation is below budget (0.68 per cent versus 0.75 per cent) and security and sector selection (2.4 per cent).

Sponsored Content

The selection component increased nearly 40 basis points over the previous quarter, and has prompted staff to review these active risk limits and propose expanding ranges for approval by the committee in coming months.

Total fund forecast total risk is 50 basis points lower than last quarter, in line with declining overall market volatility. All of the asset classes experienced lower total risk over the last quarter, with the exception of global fixed-income.

The risk management unit also monitors total fund concentrations across asset classes including country, industry, currency and security types, the current cross-asset class industry overweights include capital goods, consumer durables and apparel, and diversified financials.

Underweights are energy, food beverage and tobacco, materials and REITs.

Asset type concentrations are an overweight to structured credit and underweight to government bonds. The largest active exposure to a particular country is an underweight to the US

CalPERS total fund

Asset class       Asset allocation           risk allocation

Global equities            53%     66%

AIM                            14        20

RE                               7          7

ILAC                          3          3

Cash                            2          0

Global fixed income   21        4

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Architect of Future Fund investment strategy resigns

A chief architect of the A$68 billion ($60 billion) Australian Future Fund‘s investment strategy will leave in two weeks to form a new business offering asset allocation and macroeconomic strategy advice to large fiduciary investors globally. Tony Day, who joined the Future Fund in its early days of 2007, said that at 44 years of

Process over performance

Using performance, even as a filter, to hire or fire funds managers is a dangerous game, according to head of the international division at Enhanced Investment Technologies (INTECH), David Schofield. Choosing any partner, whether personal or business, can be fraught with complexity, and the process of hiring and firing managers does not escape those selection

Hedge FoFs on the wane with experienced investors

Hedge funds have had a bad rap for a long time, often undeserved. But the global financial crisis coupled with the Madoff scandal has affected their growth. UK-based alternatives research firm Preqin surveyed 50 institutional investors about their investments with hedge funds and hedge funds of funds (FoFs). The demands of institutional investors following their

Be aware of absolute returns, because it’s a relative world

Is it possible for a human being to manage an absolute-returns fund? If you believe the latest behavioural finance research, it must be very difficult. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

How active management saved the UN

The $32 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund has outperformed due to a commitment to active management, a willingness to invest away from the trending market, and a realistic target return. (click on the photo for more…)mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UniSuper’s specialist revolution for global equities

The A$25 billion ($21 billion) UniSuper is revolutionising its $4 billion international equities portfolio, terminating every active developed markets manager in favour of passively tracking the MSCI World, while alpha is sought among specialist regional and sectoral managers, with a listed technology mandate to be first cab off the rank. The chief investment officer of

Previous