Equity risk still dominates CalPERS portfolio

CalPERS’ 52 per cent asset allocation to global equities accounts for 69 per cent of its total risk allocation, according to the fund’s risk management update to the end of June.

Similarly, the alternative investment management program has a larger risk allocation than its capital allocation – 20 per cent compared with an actual investment allocation of 14 per cent. Fixed income dramatically brings the total risk down, with a 21 per cent asset allocation but 3 per cent total risk allocation.

According to the risk management quarterly update, presented to the investment committee this week, equity risk is estimated at nearly 90 per cent of total risk and remains the most significant risk in the fund’s asset allocation.

The total fund tracking error is 2.05 per cent, above the budgeted 1.5 per cent, but below the March quarter’s 2.46 per cent.

At 13.4 per cent, total risk is 90 basis points below the March quarter level.

The active allocation risk is 0.5 per cent, down from 0.71 per cent the previous quarter. This is primarily due to a reduction in the global equities overweight position from 3.6 to 2.9 per cent.

Sponsored Content

Liquidity risk also remains a concern for the fund, with the document warning that a sharp correction in risky assets, combined with a credit squeeze, could pose liquidity risks reminiscent of the 2008 financial crisis.

However, the fund has taken a number of steps to minimise this risk, including the implementation of a 4 per cent liquidity portfolio consisting of short- and long-maturity US Treasuries in July this year.

In addition, unfunded commitments in private equity and real estate are nearly half the size of the 2008 levels; and the securities lending reinvestment portfolio is much smaller and has a lower leverage limit compared to the cash collateral.

With regard to risk management, the CalPERS’ investment committee also has plans to complete the testing and go live with its new risk management system, Barra, and conduct a board risk management workshop in the Fall.

Meanwhile, the separate risk management committee, established in April 2011, has produced a “top risk” list across the fund, with the CalPERS Pension System Resumption (PSR) system, and investment controls and systems ranking as the two highest residual risks facing the fund.

The fund is implementing a new CFO function and enhancing investment accounting policies, which among other things aim to mitigate this investment risk.

The PSR – which will replace 49 systems for managing member enrolments, benefits and contributions – is expected to remain a high risk until it is fully implemented. It is already 18 months overdue.

The committee reports that work is also underway to develop quantitative risk measures and a relational database to house the assessments, allowing for real-time reports.

It is also recruiting for new positions in the risk intelligence office.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Peter Bernstein: Risk Inverse

Peter Bernstein, an economic consultant and respected investment thinker passed away on Friday June 5 in New York. Widely regarded as an intellectual giant in the investment circles for his ability to translate complex mathematical models into practical applications, he founded the Journal of Portfolio Management in 1974 and wrote a number of respected books

…as consultant assessment initiates changes to internal equity team and technology

CalPERS has reached its capacity to internally manage equities portfolios and would need to make changes to technology and staff resources if the internally-managed equities program is expanded, according to the outcome of the annual consultant review of CalPERS’ internal equity team by Wilshire Associates. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Asset class review inspires opportunistic allocation at CalPERS’

CalPERS is considering adopting an “opportunistic” program seeking to profit from substantially undervalued assets across various asset classes and strategies, and will be limited to 3 per cent of the fund’s total market value. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The future of risk management: How independent should risk management be?

Barry Schachter, research associate with the EDHEC Risk and Asset Management Research Centre and director, quantitative resources, Moore Capital Management believes the current crisis is a catalyst for change in the conduct of risk management because it has challenged the efficacy of the existing risk management model, but simply imposing regulation is not the change

SWFs struck at financial crisis epicentre: $50b in losses from financials

For their biggest public market investments in the last two years, sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) zeroed-in on the most dogged companies in the worst-performing sector: Western financials. These decisions incurred paper losses of $US56.3 billion, accounting for most of their public market losses for the period. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Working hard for the money

Last year large institutional investors in the US, including the State of Massachusetts Pension Fund and CalPERS, dedicated money to senior bank loans. Amanda White examines the outlook for the sector and talks to group head of ING’s senior loan group, Jeff Bakalar, about whether institutional allocations to the sector have been tactical or strategic.

Previous