Dutch fund stumps up for collateral risk solution

In a sign of the paranoid times, huge Dutch pension administrator Mn Services has installed a collateral management offering, which forms part of a counterparty risk management suite tailored for this environment by Omgeo.

Mn Services, which manages 56 billion euros on behalf of 1.1 million individuals and 33,000 employers and is owned by two local pension funds, has installed Omgeo’s Protocoll software, which claims to provide an end-to-end, event-driven collateral and margin management tool allowing clients to identify, negotiate and satisfy their daily margin calls.

Omgeo, a vendor into the post-trade administration space, claims Protocoll gives its users insight into their firms’ exposures and risk profiles, handling margin requirements across OTC derivatives, repos, securities lending, leveraged trading, emerging markets and loan facilities.

The head of risk control at Mn Services, Muhittin Elvan, said Protocoll “not only identifies collateral discrepancies, but gives transparency into those exceptions to highlight which details need to be resolved between parties”.

MnServices, which is owned by Dutch metalworker pension funds PME and PMT, recently said it expected crisis-led consolidation in the Dutch pension fund market would create outsourcing opportunities that could see it lift its funds under management by up to 15 billion euros in the next two years.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous