DiNapoli’s first snag at NY State fund as markets sour again

After three tumultuous years of reforms including a raft of new policies and procedures at the third-largest pension fund in the US, culminating in a 25.9 per cent return last year, Thomas DiNapoli, the New York State Comptroller, has hit a snag in the last quarter.The New York State Common Retirement Fund (CRF) returned  -4.38 per cent in the June quarter, it was announced last week, ending the period with $124.8 billion invested. This is the first bad news for the fund, which attracts a lot of politically inspired commentary, for more than a year.

The reformist DiNapoli, who oversees all audits of state government agencies as well as acting as sole trustee for the CRF, introduced quarterly reporting as part of his policy on greater transparency. He also commissioned an audit, by Mercer Sentinel, of his own compliance at the fund, going through investment decisions back to the start of his term in February 2007. The report this year found one small mistake, when a management fee was disclosed separately from a contract.

Throughout the global financial crisis, DiNapoli, a former state legislator, stood by his staff’s decisions on allocations to alternatives and direct investments, as the fund’s total value dropped from over $150 billion, while also tilting the equities portfolio towards New York-resident companies and stepping up a program to invest in mortgages for affordable housing.

The 25.9 per cent return for the year to March, compares with solid but less spectacular returns for the (admittedly different periods) two larger pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS. CalPERS earned 11.6 per cent in the year to June, while CalSTRS earned 12.2 per cent.

The CRF annual result was helped by returns of just over 50 per cent each for domestic and international broad market equities. In June the CRF terminated a $600 million global ex-US mandate with Goldman Sachs Asset Management. It made its first investment in emerging managers within its absolute returns strategy, giving $200 million to a fund-of-funds called Rock Creek Empire Fund. It also invested another 20 million euro ($25.75 million) through an existing European buyout manager, Gilde Buyout Fund.

DiNapoli also introduced a policy banning the use of placement agents in mandate appointments; forbidding the fund from doing business with anyone who made a political donation to the Comptroller’s Office in the past two years and introduced monthly reporting of manager hirings and firings.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous