Crisis will force private real estate to go public

Tight credit conditions in the US will diminish the private sector’s monopoly on residential and commercial property, driving assets into public markets and real estate investment trusts (REITs) loaded with cash from a spate of capital raisings.

 

In the four years preceding the market meltdown, REITs were net sellers of property assets to private equity funds thriving on cheap debt. But this momentum has reversed as public markets have become a more affordable source of capital in a credit-crunched world.

Todd Briddell, chief investment officer of Urdang, a global REIT manager within the BNY Mellon stable, says REITs will favour the less debt-ridden assets flowing from the private arena.

“The market is shaping up for a re-emergence of the REIT market worldwide,” Briddell says.

Sponsored Content

“Public markets haven’t supported high levels of debt but private equity has. In a less-levered world, REITs which favour less-levered balance sheets will be at a competitive advantage relative to highly levered private equity.”

He says as much as 92 per cent of the US real estate market is owned by private equity managers or held in other arrangements among institutional investors, following a glut of deals that peaked in 2004-05 and continued right up until 2007.

The surge of capital raisings undertaken by REIT managers this year had repaired balance sheets and, for some, provided a foundation upon which future raisings can be conducted to fund acquisitions.

“Management teams are going to preserve their liquidity as a show of strength in order to issue new equity for future acquisitions. It’s show money.”

But since credit spreads will continue to increase, making debt expensive and encouraging companies to keep cutting leverage, future acquisitions will be done with greater volumes of company stock.

“Expect bond holders to be ultimately paid off with equity in public REITs. That’s what happened in the early 1990s recovery.”

In Asia, a fast-growing REIT market led by China, public ownership of property through listed markets is becoming more widespread because foreign investors prefer this arrangement over direct acquisitions.

Primarily accessed through Hong Kong-based property companies, the Chinese real estate market presents many opportunities, Briddell says. But its growth will not follow a smooth trajectory, and government policies can have the effect of either encouraging or discouraging investment.

“A market with the momentum of China will always have periods of over-building. Also, the stimulus policies are subject to change, and so might be the reporting of economic growth, so we’re all learning how to think through the China opportunity.”

Taking a macro view of global markets, Briddell says government policies have become “the big X-factor” shaping future investment strategies, since stimulus spending has become a strong and sudden force influencing capital markets and economic fundamentals.

For example, how the US manages its budget and debt problems will affect the strength of its market and currency, he says.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous