Crisis will force private real estate to go public

Tight credit conditions in the US will diminish the private sector’s monopoly on residential and commercial property, driving assets into public markets and real estate investment trusts (REITs) loaded with cash from a spate of capital raisings.

 

In the four years preceding the market meltdown, REITs were net sellers of property assets to private equity funds thriving on cheap debt. But this momentum has reversed as public markets have become a more affordable source of capital in a credit-crunched world.

Todd Briddell, chief investment officer of Urdang, a global REIT manager within the BNY Mellon stable, says REITs will favour the less debt-ridden assets flowing from the private arena.

“The market is shaping up for a re-emergence of the REIT market worldwide,” Briddell says.

Sponsored Content

“Public markets haven’t supported high levels of debt but private equity has. In a less-levered world, REITs which favour less-levered balance sheets will be at a competitive advantage relative to highly levered private equity.”

He says as much as 92 per cent of the US real estate market is owned by private equity managers or held in other arrangements among institutional investors, following a glut of deals that peaked in 2004-05 and continued right up until 2007.

The surge of capital raisings undertaken by REIT managers this year had repaired balance sheets and, for some, provided a foundation upon which future raisings can be conducted to fund acquisitions.

“Management teams are going to preserve their liquidity as a show of strength in order to issue new equity for future acquisitions. It’s show money.”

But since credit spreads will continue to increase, making debt expensive and encouraging companies to keep cutting leverage, future acquisitions will be done with greater volumes of company stock.

“Expect bond holders to be ultimately paid off with equity in public REITs. That’s what happened in the early 1990s recovery.”

In Asia, a fast-growing REIT market led by China, public ownership of property through listed markets is becoming more widespread because foreign investors prefer this arrangement over direct acquisitions.

Primarily accessed through Hong Kong-based property companies, the Chinese real estate market presents many opportunities, Briddell says. But its growth will not follow a smooth trajectory, and government policies can have the effect of either encouraging or discouraging investment.

“A market with the momentum of China will always have periods of over-building. Also, the stimulus policies are subject to change, and so might be the reporting of economic growth, so we’re all learning how to think through the China opportunity.”

Taking a macro view of global markets, Briddell says government policies have become “the big X-factor” shaping future investment strategies, since stimulus spending has become a strong and sudden force influencing capital markets and economic fundamentals.

For example, how the US manages its budget and debt problems will affect the strength of its market and currency, he says.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous