Consultant warns of PPIP risks

The Pension Consulting Alliance is warning clients to exercise caution in investing in the Public-Private Investment Program, advising that other opportunistic fixed income investments offer a better risk/return profile.


In a letter to clients, the US consulting firm said lack of investment liquidity was a key concern, with investors facing a long lock-up period of eight years while still being subject to potential capital calls.

In addition they were complex structured securities requiring high levels of scrutiny, contained leverage and some uncertainty associated with price discovery, and were in a highly volatile and illiquid market.

The consultant also warned there could be potential for high investment management fees and misalignment of interest.

Under the program the government will make $30 billion available in one-to-one financing available to the nine managers to buy troubled securities from financial institutions.

The selected managers have up to three months to raise at least $500 million from private investors, which PCA said was a tight deadline in which to evaluate PPIP investments.

Sponsored Content

PCA’s analysis of the underlying assets, which are legacy senior residential mortgage-backed securities and senior commercial mortgage-backed securities which have fallen dramatically in price during the economic downturn, shows they will continue to exhibit significant credit and default risks.

While there are some benefits to the PPIP mortgage securities program, including potentially large returns and no mark-to-market accounting, PCA also said manager selection issues were heightened.

Only a small number of funds managers have been selected, which greatly limits the breadth of manager selection usually exercised, PCA said.

The managers participating in the initial round of the program are:

  • AllianceBernstein, LP and
    its sub-advisors Greenfield Partners, LLC and Rialto Capital Management, LLC;
  • Angelo, Gordon & Co.,
    L.P. and GE Capital Real Estate;
  • BlackRock, Inc.;
  • Invesco Ltd.;
  • Marathon Asset Management, L.P.;
  • Oaktree Capital Management,
    L.P.;
  • RLJ Western Asset
    Management, LP.;
  • The TCW Group, Inc.; and
  • Wellington Management
    Company, LLP.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

How to avoid being the butt of a carbon price joke

Executive director of the Asset Owners Disclosure Project and business director of the Climate Institute, Julian Poulter, aruges the progress of carbon legislation in Australia is a wake-up call to asset owners around the globe. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price is right for a low carbon future

Australia’s lower house of Parliament passed a carbon tax yesterday. It prices carbon at $23 a ton. India’s carbon tax is 80 rupees (about $1) a ton. So what is the appropriate price of carbon? According to Robert Litterman in his Financial Analysts Journal editorial, it is a complex equation that should reflect fundamental uncertainty

Déjà vu as Wilshire warns CalPERS of ARS portfolio risks

CalPERS’ absolute return strategies program is over-reliant on quantitative tools, inadequately staffed and may be overweight in certain strategies and risks, according to Wilshire’s annual review of the portfolio.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Investors have more than just voting in their engagement armoury, study finds

Institutional investors are using just a fraction of the “weapons” they have at their disposal when they engage with companies, and need to use the entire proxy proposal process better, Rob Bauer told attendees at a recent PRI conference.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

DiNapoli defends DB schemes

New York State Comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, has defended public defined benefit schemes, saying that they are not a drag on state government finances, are sustainable and form a vital part of the US economy.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Funds seek the elixir of scale

The investment firepower and cost savings promised by economies of scale have enraptured the Australian superannuation industry. This has instilled in some funds an urge to merge in order to enjoy the benefits of being large. However some investment chiefs believe that bigger size brings a new set of problems that can undermine performance.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous