Co-investment opportunities come to the fore

The distress in the financial markets is offering Australian superannuation funds good opportunities to achieve a higher internal rate of return (IRR) on quality assets purchased directly.

Sam Magee, commercial director at Australian investment manager Industry Funds Management (IFM), told the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) held in Australia this week, that there are now more opportunities to buy quality assets at a better price.

“With more distressed sellers, more sellers and less buyers, you can get better IRR out of the market,” Magee said.

Magee said direct investment was about more than just paying the most cash to win the asset, and it was critical to know when to walk away from a deal.

“There is no shame in walking away from the wrong deal,” he said. “The alternative could be losing potentially millions if the asset doesn’t stack up to the valuation.”

Sponsored Content

Co-investment with other institutional investors can help to balance the portfolio and provide access to quality deals, Magee said.

However super funds must “vet potential co-investment partners, to ensure their interests are aligned with the other investors entering the consortium.

Potentially dangerous co-investors include conflicted investors, who are not necessarily driven by the return on equity, those who are politically sensitive, and “goughing” co-investors – who are heavily focused on fees.

Preferred co-investors are those that do not charge upfront or ongoing fees; do not have conflicts of interest; and that share an aligned view about getting the deal done.

Selecting the right advisers on the deal is just as important as choosing the right co-investors, and once the deal is done, the asset must be reviewed regularly, Magee said.

IFM has invested A$1.5 billion purchasing interests in 45 assets around the world.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous