ATP staff reduce own CO2 emissions

Each employee of the $110 billion Danish fund, ATP has saved the environment 300 kilograms of CO2 in one year, according to its first climate change report, which coincides with the fund’s strategic move to focus on climate and environmental considerations within its investment policy.


The report shows ATP’s total CO2 emissions were reduced by 202 tons from 2007 to 2008, equivalent to a 7.4 per cent for the year. The fund entered into partnership with the Carbon Disclosure Project in 2008.

ATP will continue to focus on decreasing CO2 emissions through technology and increased purchase of green electricity.

The fund has decided to increase its focus on climate and environmental considerations in its investment policy with particular focus on the risks associated with unstable weather conditions, temperature increases and changes in precipitation.

The chief executive of the fund, Lars Rohde, said CO2-reducing measures often make good business sense by reducing both costs and risks in the future.

“It is also important to us that companies take a stand on the news business opportunities presented by climate change. That way we can act responsibly towards our members today and future members.”

Sponsored Content

The property division of the fund, ATP Real Estate, already cooperates with other property funds around
the world to harness solar energy and rain water to make the properties self-sufficient in the longer term.

The fund recently released its investment results, also a good news story, with a positive return of DKK7.5 billion ($1.5 billion) for the first half of the year.

The fund returned positive investment returns on four of five risk classes, only inflation-linked securities, comprising properties and infrastructure ended 1 per cent lower.

The bond portfolio returned 3 per cent, while the equity return came to 9 per cent. However the results cover wide variations: listed domestic equities surged by 39 per cent, while private equities dropped by 10 per cent. The return on credit instruments was 7 per cent, while oil rose by nearly 15 per cent.

Asset Owner:ATP

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous