Clash of the titans: investors and managers at odds over alternatives regulation

A battle has broken out between investors and suppliers over the regulation of hedge fund and private equity managers, with opposing testimony given to the US Senate by the country’s largest pension fund, the $180.9 billion CalPERS, and a US-based venture capital firm. In this “Have Your Say” column we ask you whether you agree with CalPERS that all hedge fund managers raising capital in the US should be forced to register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), or whether you think the current regulations are sufficient.

Testifying to the US Senate banking subcommittee on securities, insurance and investment recently on regulating
hedge funds and other private investment pools, Joe Dear, chief investment officer of CalPERS recommended that all investment managers raising funds in the US be forced to register with the SEC and be subject to its oversight.

However Trevor Loy, founder and general partner of Flywheel Ventures, a venture capital firm based in New Mexico, argued in his testimony that venture capital should be exempt from the requirement to register with the SEC under
the Investment Advisers Act and that additional SEC registration requirements could hamper venture activity.

He said that the venture capital industry’s activities were “not interwoven with US financial markets” and that
venture capital investment does not qualify as posing systemic risk for the following reasons:

*Venture capital firms are not interdependent with the world financial system

Sponsored Content

*The venture capital industry is small in size

*Venture capital firms do not use long-term leverage or rely on short-term funding

“We do recognise the need for transparency into our activities and, in that spirit, venture firms have provided information to the SEC for decades,” he said.

“We believe this information remains sufficient to meet the need for transparency without burdening our firms with additional regulations that do not further the understanding of systemic risk. We agree that those entities and industries which could cause financial system failure should be better monitored so that the events of 2008 are never repeated. However, venture capital is not one of those industries. Our size and operations within the private market do not pose broader financial risk.”

Should hedge fund managers be forced to register with the SEC?

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Quant modelling in private equity a sign of maturity

Managing director of Adveq, Peter Laib, believes private equity fund-of-fund portfolios need more analytical oversight and that diversification should be driven by the timing of capital in the market, not the number of funds. He spoke with Amanda White about the next phase of private equity as an asset class. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2

CalPERS’ absolute return mess

Wilshire’s annual review of CalPERS’ internal risk managed absolute return strategies (RMARS) has revealed a number of anomalies compared with its other global equity investments, including an over-reliance on quantitative tools and inadequate staff compensation incentives. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Swedish pension fund collaboration to influence local market

Four of Sweden’s national pension funds (AP1-4) have collaborated with another nine investors to form the Swedish arm of The Sustainable Value Creation, and have already begun surveying the top 100 companies on the NASDAQ OMX Stockholm regarding their governance policies and sustainable value creation. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Crisis will force private real estate to go public

Tight credit conditions in the US will diminish the private sector’s monopoly on residential and commercial property, driving assets into public markets and real estate investment trusts (REITs) loaded with cash from a spate of capital raisings. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Commodity investing: papering over the problems

As funds globally review their investment policies, investment consultants are now strongly endorsing commodity investment, with funds generally planning a staged 3 to 6 per cent strategic allocation into commodities. Writing exclusively for conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, chairman of Mountain Pacific Group, Ronald Liesching, traces the history of commodity investing, highlighting the risks and benefits for pension fund

Russell changes tune on TAA

After a long history of opposition to tactical asset allocation, Russell Investments has not become a convert but is allowing for a “slower twitch” version of the discipline, says global chief investment officer of the consultant and multimanager, Peter Gunning. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous