CIC No.2 set for take-off

The Chinese Government is expected to provide details this month of its new fund – being dubbed the “Industrial CIC” or” CIC 2” – which will centralise oversight of various state-owned businesses.According to a report in the weekly Chinese-language ‘Economic Observer’ the fund, whose actual title is ‘State Assets Management Company’, had been delayed because of negotiations with potential senior management, including a chief executive.

The fund will start with about 10 state-owned companies, which will be added to over time, with a view to better oversee and administer the combined resources between them.

The CIC (China Investment Corporation) was established with $200 billion, a little over half of which is available for investment in financial assets and direct investments. The rest of the funding is made up of the Government’s stakes in large Chinese banks, including the recently floated Agricultural Bank of China and the ICBC. These stakes are held through a CIC subsidiary, Central Huijin.

The newspaper report says: “After the new asset management firm is set up, the biggest change will be that the SASAC will alter its method of supervision of some small centrally-owned enterprises – gradually converting its capital usage to pursue investment returns rather than administrative work.”

The fund is expected to be initially capitalized at 20 billion RMB ($2.95 billion).

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Warren Buffett’s excellent adventure

'Youngster’ Warren Buffett (85) rebuffed risks from sugar and climate change as he toured the American economy with his ‘older’ offsider, Charlie Munger (92), presenting at the Berkshire Hathaway AGM .

Pay for performance

Pension fund executive pay varies widely around the globe, with differences based on internal management and alternatives exposures. Amanda White examines pension fund executive pay.

A long way to go

It’s all very well to have diversity, but most people lack the tools for how to get the best out of a diverse team. Instead the reverse is true and diversity can lead to an unlevel playing field.

Too much of a good thing

Experts at the Thinking Ahead Institute outline the pitfalls of implementing team diversity, , when too much diversity fails us, and how organisations can be champions for change.

Income the key dimension

Risk should be defined as the inability to meet retirement income goals, so investors and their managers should forget alpha and other “distractions”, according to David Booth.

Worlds colliding

The debate about the effect of pay inequality on both the financial and real-world markets is about to get a whole lot hotter this year.

Previous