CalSTRS expands active/passive decision making

CalSTRS will double the ranges of its active/passive global equities allocations in a bid to enable investment staff to allocate funds tactically across active and passive rather than be forced to rebalance to strategic asset allocations.


At the February investment committee meeting, CalSTRS concluded its active/passive review of global equities and fixed income — which took nearly nine months — recommending moving the active/passive bands for the US and non-US segments of the global equity portfolio to 10 per cent, while keeping fixed income at the same ranges.

According to a staff report to the investment committee, endorsed by consultant PCA, staff found the 5 per cent range for the non-US portfolio restrictive during times of extreme market conditions..

The report says during the past 18 months the global equities portfolio has periodically “bumped up” against the current ranges which has the potential to force portfolio movements at points that would not be opportune within the market environment.

“This modest level of increased staff discretion will provide the flexibility necessary for staff to shift assets deliberately rather than having the current ranges dictate asset allocation decisions. The expanded ranges will be an important tool used to add alpha in the global equity portfolio by enabling staff to position the portfolio more tactically which, in turn, will broaden the opportunity set.”

The active/passive study has been presented over three investment committee meetings beginning in September 2009 and the latest presentation included a comparison of how other large plans were positioned.

Sponsored Content

Information obtained by Pension Data Exchange and from questionnaires sent to peers showed most US equities were passively managed when viewed in aggregate, while public pension funds favoured active management in non-US equities, with almost 75 per cent of the funds having a higher allocation to active than passive.

The global equities and fixed income portfolios make up about 75 per cent of the fund assets.

 

CalSTRS active/passive mix – global equities

Current range  Proposed range

US passive  65-75%  60-80%

US active  25-35%  20-40%

Non-US passive  45-55% 40-60%

Non-US active  45-55%  40-60%

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The road to $1 trillion: Alternatives come of age

Pension funds have invested nearly $1 trillion in alternative assets with the world’s largest managers, with total investments in the asset growing by 12 per cent last year, research has revealed.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Temasek’s gaze fixed on China

China is the largest investment destination for Temasek Holdings, with Bank of China and China Construction Bank two of its most significant holdings. Finding investment opportunities in Asia is also the key focus for the Singaporean investment company.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Short-term focus needed to get long duration exposure

Despite recent volatility in equity markets, pension plans looking to transition to a liability-matched investment portfolio need to be proactive to mitigate the risk associated with the move, a US-based consultant has advised.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Industry fails to go “Gaga” on social media

Recent ructions in financial markets may have increased the worries of many asset managers but you are unlikely to see them telling the world about their glide path plans or their fat tails risks on a social media site, a new survey has found.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The evolution of risk

Chief investment officer of Windham Capital Management and researcher extraordinaire, Mark Kritzman, is using his proprietary turbulence and systemic risk indicators to calculate the internal systemic risk of total institutional portfolios. He says this analysis can deliver a powerful precursor to portfolio volatility in the future.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

What price liquidity?

Two interwoven areas of investment management – liquidity and risk management – have become a boon for academics in the wake of the financial crisis and the liquidity black holes that apparently formed within endowment and pension funds. It may seem to be an overabundance of research, but it’s in line with demand. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous