CalSTRS cost breakdown supports internal savings…

A breakdown of CalSTRS’ investment costs confirms the cost savings of internal asset management, with the fund’s internal asset management costs making up only 0.07 per cent of the total portfolio management costs, but comprising 30 per cent of the total assets managed.

In a presentation to the board at a meeting this week, chief investment officer Christopher Ailman reveals the total cost of managing the $135 billion CalSTRS portfolio is $174 million a year, with only $12.5 million of that spent on internal asset management.

“Internal management of the assets is considerably less expensive than external management. As a basic rule, over the past five years, it costs about one tenth the cost to manage assets internally compared to externally. As the plan continues to grow, staff and the investment committee should look for opportunities where assets can be competitively managed by internal staff rather than external managers.”

According to a breakdown of CalSTRS’ management fees versus a peer group’s median cost, the fund saved about 11.5 basis points on the global equity portfolio by managing it in-house. The highest savings were in US small cap active, where the saving was 41.3 basis points, and US large cap active where the saving was 24 basis points.

Reducing costs is one of the three core objectives of the fund in this fiscal year, and savings have already been made in both internal and external asset management costs.

Sponsored Content

The investments branch is set to achieve nearly 25 per cent savings, achieved through salary savings and expense reduction – including spending 7 per cent less on salaries, although this is partly due to staff vacancies – while renegotiation of external fees has resulted in an 8.5 per cent reduction in fees paid to external managers.

According to the report every global equity manager except one has been willing to renegotiate and lower their fees.

Despite the cost reductions, Ailman said overall the cost structure of the fund had risen. He said in line with other large funds, the complexity and specialisation of larger funds that have more complex asset allocation has resulted in higher costs.

The team will discuss the long-term financial plan and cost of the portfolio at a July business plan meeting.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous