CalPERS limits derivatives use

In line with its recently-approved leverage policy, the $181 billion fund for Californian public employees, CalPERS, has reviewed its derivatives policy for global equities, with notional leverage constrained to a new limit of 10 per cent of the value of the global equities portfolio.

In addition, guidelines to implementing derivatives will be written to cover each derivative strategy in CalPERS’ investment office.

At a minimum those guidelines will include: the purpose of the derivative strategy; justification for the use of derivatives; a description of the risks inherent in the strategy and how they will be managed including pricing, liquidity and legal risk; and procedures for monitoring and managing the derivative exposure relative to the strategy including protocols for prompt reporting of the violation of limits.

This new derivatives policy brings the existing synthetic enhanced equity portfolios in line with the recently-approved leverage policy, which was adopted in May and set out various definitions of leverage and methods for monitoring leverage across all of CalPERS assets.

In the leverage policy, “notional leverage” is defined as “exposure to non-cash-like-securities, that exceeds the value of the capital employed”.

In the most recent asset allocation review, approved this month, the allocation to global equities was reduced to 49 per cent (from 56 per cent).

Sponsored Content

Within its internally managed enhanced equities portfolio, the investment team is permitted to use financial futures, equity swaps and options permitting the investment dividends received, equitise cash and dividends receivable; adjust portfolio risk characteristics in the most cost-effective manner; and facilitate investment of cash flows related to contributions, withdrawals, or asset allocation compliance.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous