CalPERS flooded with consultant RFPs after changes to wish-list

CalPERS has received 17 applications in response to its RFP for a general pension consultant services spring-fed pool – four times the applications of its last review – and will select consultants during its April 20 investment
committee meeting.

Since the last review in 2004, CalPERs made a series of changes to the consultant requirements, including the development of six service areas to increase the potential of receiving proposals from a higher number of firms in various investment specialties, revising the minimum qualifications of operating history and the experience of key personnel in providing consultant services to institutional funds clients.

There has been $1.2 million budgeted to spend on the consultants annually, but until the composition of the pool has been determined, the costs are not final.

Staff will present the ranked list of successful proposers for the committee review at the March 16 meeting, and a decision will be made the following month.

The $174.2 billion fund held an investment committee meeting last Tuesday with agenda items including an asset allocation review in the first half of 2009.

Sponsored Content

CalPERS set its new asset allocation on December 15, 2008, with policy targets to be implemented over a period of three to four years.

It changed its global equities allocation from 60 to 56 per cent and increased the private equity allocation from 6 to 10 per cent.

Global fixed income was also decreased, from 26 to 19 per cent, and inflation linked assets increased from an old policy target of 0 to 5 per cent.

Real estate targets increased from 8 to 10 per cent, while cash remained at the zero target allocation.

Among other things the committee was due to discuss were recommendations by consultant Wilshire to add two growth managers, rumoured to include Martin Currie and OFI Institutional Asset Management, one global core manager as well as two emerging markets managers. Any changes are yet to be confirmed.

It is expected that CalPERS will increase the amount of money managed internally, as its own managers have done well compared with external managers.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous