CalPERS’ first review of ILAC results in benchmark appraisal

CalPERS has conducted its first-ever annual review of the inflation-linked asset class (ILAC) program and has made a number of changes including moving the responsibility of the asset class to real estate. Amanda White looks at the fund’s plans for ILAC in the coming year.


Inflation-linked asset class has only been a separate asset class at CalPERS since January 2008 and while it has a strategic asset allocation of 5 per cent, the total fund allocation currently sits at around 2.4 per cent.

This review, the first for the fund, has produced a number of structural and implementation changes to the management of the asset class.

One of the consequences of the review is to hand responsibilities of the asset class to the senior investment officer of real estate (SIO-RE), away from the asset allocation team.

Sponsored Content

This year the fund will commit up to $900 million to funds and $400 million to direct infrastructure on a selective basis and will also build a direct investment capability within infrastructure.

It will also review the benchmark of the ILAC program – which is currently CPI plus 400 basis points – based on the asset mix and results.

Wilshire Associates, the fund’s consultant, is encouraging a rethinking of the benchmark.

“While CPI+$ is an appropriate long term target for inflation-linked assets in general, the substantial investment in commodities is causing quite a bit of tracking error in the total program.

“Depending on the preference of the SIO-RE after he integrates ILAC into his team, the benchmark could be changed to a roll-up of each program’s benchmark or he could decrease the weighting to commodities.

“Although the prior CIO believed strongly in managing the entire asset class against CPI+4, we believe the more pragmatic approach is to change the benchmark to better reflect the considerable volatility of commodities.”

Wilshire Associates says the SIO-RE should present to the investment committee his plan for how to manage this portfolio and how he intends to allocate assets among the various programs as soon as practical.

“We believe it is paramount that the SIO-RE has a clear methodology in place for managing these new assets,” the consultant said in a letter to the investment committee.

ILAC includes infrastructure, commodities, forestland and inflation-linked bonds, and the fund is well below its allocation to infrastructure with a current commitment of 0.11 per cent, against a benchmark of 1.5 per cent of the total fund.

Similarly commodities is 0.41 per cent, compared to 1.5 per cent, while inflation-linked bonds sits at 0.74 per cent (target weight of 1 per cent), and forestland at 1.12 per cent (compared to 1 per cent).

The total ILAC allocation of 2.4 per cent represents about $4.84 billion.

Meketa Investment Group, the fund’s infrastructure consultant, said that CalPERS had some internal resource constraints, which are being addressed, that contributed to the slow pace of commitments in 2009. The fund made one new partnership commitment only during the year, bringing the total number of partnerships to four, and $88.5 million only was committed across those partnerships throughout the year.

In a letter to the investment committee, the consultant goes on to say the most meaningful development to the infrastructure program in 2009 was the development of its internal investment capabilities.

Last year it hired two portfolio managers, and now has five in the team, and began developing internal processes and external sourcing capabilities focused on executing direct infrastructure investments.

This is a step in the right direction to support CalPERS’ objective of pursuing direct investment opportunities.
CalPERS only made its first infrastructure commitment as part of this program, only two years ago.

The ILAC asset class has performed well with a return for the year to December of 5.97 per cent, compared with the benchmark (CPI plus 400 bps) of 4.99 per cent.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous