CalPERS backs internal, external FI managers amid liquidity ‘conundrum’

After missing the strong rally in the US high yield debt market, the $201.3 billion CalPERS’ global fixed income program, which manages about a quarter of the fund’s assets, has extended its mandates with external managers and will continue actively managing its US debt portfolio internally.

PIMCO and Nomura, the two managers appointed by CalPERS to help run domestic high yield portfolios, missed the sharp rebound in the sector after it declined precipitously as the credit cycle worsened in 2008. The rally was fuelled by the performance of companies “with the very worst prospects”, to which CalPERS held no exposure, according to a submission by asset consultant Wilshire Associates to the fund’s annual review of the $27 billion GFI program.

“Unfortunately, the subsection of the high yield market which performed best was the lowest rated companies, with CCC bonds and lower returning 100 per cent or better in many cases since the market bottom,” Wilshire writes. CalPERS held no exposure to these companies.”

The 12 months from September 2008 was a “tale of two halves” for the GFI program, as it recovered from six months of losses to post strong returns from April to September, CalPERS states.

The US debt portfolio, which, apart from some high yield investments is managed internally, posted 17.18 per cent against the 13.86 per cent gain by the fund’s customised domestic fixed income index. The international portfolio, which consists of allocations to five external managers, put up 18.46 per cent against 15.71 per cent gained by the benchmark, a blend of the Barclays Long Liabilities and International Fixed Income indexes. Its currency overlay added 0.51 per cent.

Sponsored Content

Wilshire Associates recently states the fund’s gross domestic fixed income performance was similar to the median manager’s. However in its review, CalPERS’ found its net return was 29 basis points above the median.

Since its inception in 1986, the fund’s internal US fixed income team has returned an average annual alpha of +38 basis points, at an annual cost of 1.2 basis points. The internal team manages 98 per cent of assets in the program.

CalPERS’ international fixed income allocations were first made in 1989, but were shifted into the global program in 2001. Since then, it has delivered +15 basis points of alpha. In 2008, the total cost of its external management arrangements was 17 basis points, and the full cost of the GFI program’s nine external mandates is 30 basis points.

Despite these costs, the investment committee resolved to extend the mandates with all external managers, which total $4.16 billion, by one year.

Wilshire recommended maintaining the mandates with all external managers, primarily because all five international credit managers profited from the rebound.

“All managers have had a fairly high correlation to the index over time, with no three-year rolling period for any manager less than 0.78. In almost all periods, all managers have generally had a correlation to the index of 0.9 or higher for their absolute returns,” the consultant states.

CalPERS’ also chose to continue active management of US fixed income because the long-term strategy has “succeeded” throughout economic cycles. But the recent surge in performance now requires the fund to sell $8 billion from the portfolio in the next 12 months to meet an asset allocation target of 20 per cent. After cashflow, GFI is the second largest source of liquidity for CalPERS.

This brings the conflict between the core purposes of the GFI program – investment diversification and liquidity provision – to the fore. CalPERS has found that investing in GFI to generate alpha and provide diversification created a “conundrum” because fixed income and equity markets were reasonably correlated, reducing the diversification benefit, and riskier credit strategies required liquidity to survive tough times, curbing the ability of the program to rebalance equity portfolios and help meet capital calls for the fund’s private market program.

CalPERS’ has calculated that its US fixed income portfolio held a relatively high alpha correlation with the equity market, generating a correlation coefficient of 0.38, cutting the diversification benefit. And during tough markets, most fixed income strategies aiming to capture alpha, such as investment grade credit and high yield debt, require higher levels of total fund liquidity so they are not abandoned, limiting the liquidity on standby for declining equity portfolios. In addition, CalPERS’ extensive private market program can add to these liquidity pressures, since uncommitted capital for private market assets “is effectively a call option” requiring greater total fund liquidity.

The GFI program accounts for 24 per cent of the fund’s assets, and allocates to a range of credit instruments: vanilla debt, such as global government bonds; riskier credit, including corporate, mortgage and structured credit; and opportunistic investments, such as life settlements and high yield.

In addition to helping to rebalance equity portfolios and meet private market capital calls, its excess liquidity also sustains ancillary programs, such as US fixed income, securities lending, credit enhancement, asset-based lending and a $10 billion currency overlay.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous