CalPERS and CalSTRS lose a quarter of their assets

America’s two largest pension funds both lost around a quarter of their market value in the fiscal year ended June 30, in what was the biggest ever single year decline for CalPERS.

Releasing its preliminary 2008-09 fiscal year investment performance, CalPERS said the 23.4 per cent drop in assets was the “most severe” single-year decline the fund has experienced, but still above the 29.3 per cent plunge in world equity prices over the same period.

CalSTRS’ loss of 25 per cent was largely due to a -43 per cent return on its real estate portfolio, in addition to -28.2 per cent for global equities and -27.6 per cent for private equity, spurred by unprecedented declines in global financial markets. Fixed income contributed the only positive return of 4.5 per cent.

The fund pointed out that it had chosen to “write down” the value of its real estate portfolio in a single year, rather than spreading the expected losses over several years.

Taking the losses into account, CalSTRS assets fell to $118.8 billion, compared to $162.2 billion the same time last year. CalPERS assets fell to $180.9 billion, down from $237.1 billion a year ago.

Sponsored Content

The asset class returns for CalPERS were: 1.4 per cent for cash, 0.6 per cent for global fixed income, -35.8 per cent for real estate, -31.4 per cent for private equity, -28.5 per cent for public stocks and -20.9 per cent for inflation-linked assets such as commodities, infrastructure, forestland and inflation-linked bonds.

Real estate and private equity returns reflect market values through to March 31, 2009, not June. Pending appraisals in real estate and valuation adjustments in private equity will impact final year end performance numbers.

CalPERS chief investment officer Joe Dear said the result was “not a surprise” and had been expected given the collapse of markets across the globe.

“The good news is we have the opportunity to capture future returns because of our long-term investment horizon,” he said. “The system has more than enough cash through contributions and income from investments to meet our present liabilities, so we are in a good position to ride out the current downturn and come out stronger.”

CalSTRS, too, attempted to put a positive spin on the result, with chief investment officer Chris Ailman pointing out that recent portfolio adjustments, as reported last week on conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, positioned the fund for the coming recovery.

The fund has temporarily shifted 5 per cent of the portfolio from global equities to fixed income, real estate and private equity to purchase quality assets from distressed sellers, and permanently shifted 5 per cent from global equities to create a new asset class – absolute return – for inflation-protected assets such as infrastructure.

CalPERS has also repositioned its portfolio, revising its asset allocation to “maintain flexibility to make opportunistic investments in private equity, real estate and infrastructure today and planning toward a fuller asset allocation and liability review in 2010”.

The fund has engaged a board-directed initiative to advance new methods for risk management across its entire operations, and is “searching for and executing opportunistic investments resulting from market dislocations”.

CalPERS’ board recently adopted a 30-year fixed contribution schedule for local governments that will cover the funds needed to cover benefits, and won’t rely on future investment returns.

CalSTRS’ board is working to address a long-term funding gap, calculated as $22.5 billion at June 30, 2008. The fund said closing the gap would require legislative action in the future to increase contributions made by the school districts and the state.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous