CalPERS and CalSTRS lose a quarter of their assets

America’s two largest pension funds both lost around a quarter of their market value in the fiscal year ended June 30, in what was the biggest ever single year decline for CalPERS.

Releasing its preliminary 2008-09 fiscal year investment performance, CalPERS said the 23.4 per cent drop in assets was the “most severe” single-year decline the fund has experienced, but still above the 29.3 per cent plunge in world equity prices over the same period.

CalSTRS’ loss of 25 per cent was largely due to a -43 per cent return on its real estate portfolio, in addition to -28.2 per cent for global equities and -27.6 per cent for private equity, spurred by unprecedented declines in global financial markets. Fixed income contributed the only positive return of 4.5 per cent.

The fund pointed out that it had chosen to “write down” the value of its real estate portfolio in a single year, rather than spreading the expected losses over several years.

Taking the losses into account, CalSTRS assets fell to $118.8 billion, compared to $162.2 billion the same time last year. CalPERS assets fell to $180.9 billion, down from $237.1 billion a year ago.

Sponsored Content

The asset class returns for CalPERS were: 1.4 per cent for cash, 0.6 per cent for global fixed income, -35.8 per cent for real estate, -31.4 per cent for private equity, -28.5 per cent for public stocks and -20.9 per cent for inflation-linked assets such as commodities, infrastructure, forestland and inflation-linked bonds.

Real estate and private equity returns reflect market values through to March 31, 2009, not June. Pending appraisals in real estate and valuation adjustments in private equity will impact final year end performance numbers.

CalPERS chief investment officer Joe Dear said the result was “not a surprise” and had been expected given the collapse of markets across the globe.

“The good news is we have the opportunity to capture future returns because of our long-term investment horizon,” he said. “The system has more than enough cash through contributions and income from investments to meet our present liabilities, so we are in a good position to ride out the current downturn and come out stronger.”

CalSTRS, too, attempted to put a positive spin on the result, with chief investment officer Chris Ailman pointing out that recent portfolio adjustments, as reported last week on conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, positioned the fund for the coming recovery.

The fund has temporarily shifted 5 per cent of the portfolio from global equities to fixed income, real estate and private equity to purchase quality assets from distressed sellers, and permanently shifted 5 per cent from global equities to create a new asset class – absolute return – for inflation-protected assets such as infrastructure.

CalPERS has also repositioned its portfolio, revising its asset allocation to “maintain flexibility to make opportunistic investments in private equity, real estate and infrastructure today and planning toward a fuller asset allocation and liability review in 2010”.

The fund has engaged a board-directed initiative to advance new methods for risk management across its entire operations, and is “searching for and executing opportunistic investments resulting from market dislocations”.

CalPERS’ board recently adopted a 30-year fixed contribution schedule for local governments that will cover the funds needed to cover benefits, and won’t rely on future investment returns.

CalSTRS’ board is working to address a long-term funding gap, calculated as $22.5 billion at June 30, 2008. The fund said closing the gap would require legislative action in the future to increase contributions made by the school districts and the state.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous