A new card for an old infrastructure hand

 

 

 

With more than $A5 billion ($5.3 billion) invested in infrastructure through some 120 different types of assets, AustralianSuper is examining whether diversity is all its cracked up to be when it comes to infrastructure investing.

Sponsored Content

The $45-billion fund has ambitious plans to double both its infrastructure holdings and its size of its overall portfolio in five years.

As it looks to potential investments today, AustralianSuper’s head of infrastructure, Jason Peasley, explains that the investment team is looking for opportunities that will provide meaningful scale for what could be a much bigger sized fund down the track.

“Infrastructure involves active management. It is not just a beta play – there are alpha opportunities as well,” Peasley says.

If we are too diversified we risk having a portfolio that will do just the median; it is just going to be a beta return. The way our managers are structured, the fees we pay, we do expect opportunities to generate some alpha and our value add is valuing the managers and opportunities that will give that, given a certain risk profile… We should probably look at concentrating our portfolio a little more than diversifying further.”

New capital will drive increasing allocations and Peasley says that the fund is looking to invest directly in infrastructure.

According to Peasley, the “lion’s share” of the $5.3 billion invested in infrastructure is in 20 key assets, with the remaining 100 assets a “long tail” of smaller investments.

Direct investment would give the fund the flexibility and scale it needs to shape a portfolio that both complements its current holdings and also provides other avenues to market, allowing it to grow quickly.

“We see a strong role for more direct investment methods in our arsenal and we think they will compliment our existing platform and existing core managers quite well.”

AustralianSuper’s has the most infrastructure assets under management with managers Industry Funds Management (IFM) and Hastings Funds Management.

Its biggest investment is in Pacific Hydro, a company that has renewable energy projects in Brazil, Chile and Australia and makes up 13.53 per cent of AustralianSuper’s infrastructure portfolio.

AustralianSuper also has more than 18 per cent of its infrastructure investments in the growth asset of airports located in the Australian cities of Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.

Asset Owner:AustralianSuper

Leave a Comment

Texas ERS reallocates to managers to help navigate concentrated equity market

Texas ERS reallocates to managers to help navigate concentrated equity market

Texas ERS' CIO David Veal says the fund is re-allocating around a quarter of its public equity portfolio to external managers, away from the internal team. ERS plans to upsize with existing fundamental mandates but also allocate to new incremental relationships with diversifying strategies.

Sort content by

NBIM calls for more listings

Norges Bank Investment Management would like to see an increase in the number of company listings and suggests more flexibility from exchanges and index providers could facilitate this.

AIMCo’s evolving hedge fund strategy

AIMCo combines an internally run portable alpha strategy – with a global alpha pool allocated across beta exposures – with a portfolio of high-conviction specialised external hedge funds.

HOOPP fully invested in the future

HOOPP is in an extraordinary position of being 122 per cent funded. It continues to focus on innovative investments - such as credit derivatives - as a way to achieve its pension promise.

UK’s PPF ready for change

The $33 billion PPF has an investment plan that sees it reducing the reliance on inflation and interest rate swaps, and better proof the portfolio from the looming cost of derivative strategies.

PSERS CIO drives diversification

James Grossman, chief investment officer of the Pennsylvania Public School Employees Retirement System, talks about driving diversification and the opportunities in corporate debt.

Hedge fund reality check

CEM benchmarking has shed light on the unattractive returns – largely due to high costs – and lack of risk protection afforded by most pension funds’ hedge fund portfolios

Previous