Investor feedback needed for ISSB standards

It is fundamental that asset owners contribute feedback to the exposure drafts on climate and general sustainability disclosures issued by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) according to Janine Guillot, special adviser to the ISSB chair.

In March, the ISSB-issued prototypes will become exposure drafts and after the consultation process and will ultimately be the first two standards issued by ISSB.

“We expect some time in the first quarter for those exposure drafts to be issued. It is very important for asset owners to be part of the consultation process,” Guillot says.

The climate prototype has largely been based on TCFD and SASB and many asset owners had significant input into those, but it will also have a cross-metric industry component which is new. There is also a prototype on general requirements for sustainability disclosures.

Guillot says the ISSB will finalise a climate standard and general requirements standard by the end of the year partly because there are many regulators keen to mandate climate disclosures and the ISSB standard will be a helpful tool for those regulators.

Asset owners are increasingly challenged by the disclosure requirements of climate risks in their portfolios. Guillot says the most efficient way to implement those is to have globally accepted sustainability disclosure standards which are used by companies around the world. “If that happens asset owners can source the data they need for their own disclosure requirements sand integrate climate risks into their assessments,” she says. “It is vitally important they give feedback to what those disclosures might look like.”

Sponsored Content

The formation of the ISSB has been described as a historic opportunity to establish a global sustainability disclosure standard-setter for the financial markets. The ISSB is the second standard setting board, alongside the International Accounting Standards Board, under the umbrella of the IFRS Foundation.

Guillot suggested that as well as issuing two standards in the next year, there will be other significant priorities for the ISSB. While these have not been endorsed by the board, her opinion was there were three big research themes for the ISSB to focus on.

These include the next generation of climate risk metrics, human capital and biodiversity.

With regard to human capital, the SASB standards team had a two-year research project underway on human capital to get feedback on the issues most relevant to value, and where disclosure could improve. The main theme to come out of that is DEI and Guillot said a standards-setting project has begun on that.

“There is high demand for quality metrics but it is hard to do globally,” she says, encouraging asset owners to give feedback on priorities for the board’s agenda.

At COP26 the IFRS Foundation consolidated the Climate Disclosure Standards Board and the Value Reporting Foundation, itself a merger of the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Foundation and International Integrated Reporting Council.

Guillot, who was a founding executive of SASB and before that chief operating investment officer at CalPERS, says while she feels a sense of collective accomplishment with the establishment of ISSB there is still a lot of work to do.

“When I did that first interview with you back in 2016, did we ever envisage these years later we would be talking about ISSB with support of the regulators and SASB would be rolling into that? It is important to acknowledge what a monumental and historical moment this is and the important role investors have played in driving the understanding of how important standardised sustainability reporting is. It is a tremendous collective accomplishment and a huge shout out to asset owners and managers,” she says. “Having said that, this is like another beginning. It’s not like the mission is truly accomplished yet.”

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Investing in the world we want

Global head of investment research at Mercer, Deb Clarke, believes that investment opportunities viewed solely through a return-making lens carry additional risk for long-term investors. She explains why.

CFA drives diversity agenda

The CFA Institute will work with 30 asset owners and managers as “experimental partners”, implementing diversity and inclusion action plans in their businesses. We spoke to CFA's Rebecca Fender and CalSTRS' Chris Ailman about the importance of diversity. #BalanceforBetter

EU agrees on sustainable disclosure

The European Parliament and EU member states worked through the night on Wednesday to reach an agreement on disclosure requirements related to sustainable investments and sustainability risks. The agreement means that for the first time it is now clear in regulation that ESG is part of investment decision making.

Dutch fund commits to member preferences

For the first time a pension fund board has committed to implementing the results of a member survey, ex ante, resulting in the Pensioenfonds Detailhandel, the pension fund for the retail sector in the Netherlands, increasing its commitment to sustainable investing.

Why slavery needs to be a priority

Chair of the Financial Sector Commission on Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking, PRI’s Fiona Reynolds explains how the financial sector is well positioned to identify, target and disrupt these crimes and their underlying causes.

Australia misses chance to improve super

Australia’s Productivity Commission performed a review of its world-class superannuation system, with an eye toward making the best even better. But the inquiry wasted its opportunity by making recommendations that its three years of research don’t support.

Previous