Axa gets behind tobacco-free portfolios

Axa divested from tobacco in 2016 making it one of the first global insurance companies to do so. It has taken that a step further and now doesn’t insure tobacco companies. Amanda White speaks to the chair of Axa, Denis Duverne, on why this is a natural part of the company’s strategy.

Amanda White: Why is it important for your portfolio to be tobacco free?

Denis Duverne: Tobacco kills 7.5 million people per annum and that is likely to grow with emerging markets getting more affluent. As investors we have a responsibility to invest responsibily and it makes no sense to be a health insurer and invest in tobacco

Has it had an impact on returns?

It is too early to say if it has impacted returns. At the time of the decision there was a big discussion at CalPERS and when they took the decision to divest I also made that decision. And then I started to make calls to other investors to introduce the idea of tobacco free portfolios. (CalPERS did well to snuff out tobacco)

We can only really have an impact if there are more sellers than buyers, so we need this intiative to grow

Sponsored Content

What is your opinion of divestment versus engagement as a way to influence companies?

This is very different from the energy debate. Our first big divestment was from coal, our initial stance was divestment from coal manufacturers and energy suppliers with more than 50 per cent revenue from coal. We could have an engagement with them because there is an alternative, but with tobacco there is no alternative. Engagement doesn’t make any sense. They are very smart people, and very decisive and we want to avoid them.

The decision has been very well received by employees and by investors. We went way beyond divesting, and have stopped insuring tobacco companies. Most decisions matter, the only way to have an impact

The decision to divest is consistent with your corporate responsibility strategy can you talk a bit more about that?

Our corporate responsibility strategy is part of our strategy, it is not something on the side. It is a three pronged approach.

First is climate – a 3 degrees world would be totally uninsurable so we are fully inline with our strategy so in line to invest with a climate sustainable strategy

The second is health, tobacco is one element of that. We also invest in medical research including prevention activities – health can improve a lot by prevention.

Inequality – the SDGs are good for society and we think we are can have an impact by providing insurance to those that don’t currently have it eg through micro finance

All companies, managers, owners and insurance companies should make sure the strategy is aligned with the SDGs and within that health, inequality and poverty are part of those objectives.

Tobacco kills and that will increase if we do nothing.

If you want to be consistent with your own objectives you should look carefully at tobacco free as part of the solution.

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Why these impact investing veterans don’t care about ESG ratings

BlueOrchard and Schroders Capital’s impact investing veteran, Maria Teresa Zappia, isn’t a fan of using ESG performance to evaluate her portfolios, suggesting that investors are limiting their options if they are not willing to consider companies with lesser ratings.

Long term investors must focus on transition not divestment at COP28

Investors and corporations will arrive in Dubai for COP28 later this month, and the world is depending on them to recognize and address a paradox: ordinary net zero 2050 commitments are one of the biggest threats to achieving net zero carbon emissions in 2050. FCLTGlobal’s Matthew Leatherman explains.

Net zero targets drift out of reach but dynamic change is still possible

Net zero emission targets may cover most of the global economy, but the world is not going to deliver on its net zero promises, warned Oxford University’s Cameron Hepburn, speaking at Sustainability in Practice.

Abundant opportunities in dynamic, decentralised energy generation

The world is shifting from having very few centralised power stations feeding electricity into the grid, to a more dynamic market with abundant opportunities for investors, according to Alex Brierley, co-head, Octopus Energy Generation.

How to rewrite Modern Portfolio Theory to integrate climate risk

When it comes to climate risk, traditional scenario analysis leaves investors with more questions than answers and omits uncertainty around physical risk and the interaction between physical risk, inflation and tipping points. Investors need to abandon modern portfolio theory and find a new approach that focuses on short-term scenarios.

Impact investors, be wary of labeled bonds

Clarity around capital allocation and defined investment frameworks have made labeled bonds a lucrative opportunity for many impact investors. However, Oyin Oduya, impact measurement and management practice leader at the $1 trillion Wellington Management said the reality is not that straightforward.

Previous