CIOs’ confidence wanes as agility becomes the focus

There is a plunge in confidence among CIOs that they will meet their return targets, with only 36 per cent of participants in the 2023 CIO Sentiment Survey expecting they will.

This is almost half the response from the previous year where 63 per cent of CIOs were confident in meeting their return targets.

The 2023 CIO Sentiment Survey, a global collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CaseyQuirk, part of Deloitte Consulting, finds asset owners keeping their allocations static but focusing on agility as they observe dramatic market changes not seen in a generation. And only 11 per cent are taking on additional risk to achieve return targets due to the uncertainty of markets.

With a majority lacking confidence that they will meet their return targets, respondents are re-evaluating their equity exposures, re-structuring their fixed income allocations and de-emphasising private markets.

While most investors were in a wait and see holding pattern regarding allocations The data found liquid equity exposures in a holding pattern, but 31 per cent said they are considering shifting their equities to more inflation-proof sectors.

They are also de-emphasising private markets and expecting write-downs to continue until at least the end of 2023.

Sponsored Content

Fixed-income allocations are also being re-structured due to fundamental changes in the rate environment, leading to a resurgence of high-quality active fixed income, and tactical increases in active emerging market debt to take advantage of high yields.

Chris Ailman, chief investment officer of CalSTRS, which is the second largest public pension fund in the United States, said fixed income allocations had shrunk in recent years but higher returns are now reversing that trend.

“Now that [fixed income] will have 4-6 per cent return, people will be putting in more money,” Ailman said. “It’s not a massive asset allocation change, the 80/20 portfolio was creeping to 85/15, and it will go back to 80/20. That return on cash and fixed income will help with overall returns.”

Internal management and external relationships

The ongoing shift towards internal investment continues, with 75 per cent of respondents saying they plan to decrease or retain the number of managers on their roster – a figure that is 8 per cent higher than in 2022.

Understaffed internal teams and a talent shortage are the top challenges impacting investment teams, cited by 58 per cent of respondents.

While asset owners have been working hard to build improved technology into their investment process, 57 per cent feel digital advancements have not significantly enhanced their manager due diligence process.

Not a single respondent is running a fully remote operation anymore, with 40 per cent requiring their employees to be in the office between 3-4 days a week, and 35 per cent requiring 1-2 days. Most of the remainder had relatively flexible policies, with only 6 per cent requiring employees to be in the office 5 days a week.

Only 20 per cent of respondents feel it is “important” or “very important” for asset management partners to require their investment teams to be in the office.

The survey asked CIOs extensive questions across their asset allocation, costs, ESG, manager relationships, operations and risk.

The full results can be found here.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Public pension governance and asset allocation

This paper from Matt Dobra and Bruce Lubich, of the Methodist University in North Carolina and the University of Maryland University College, respectively, analyses the relationship between governance, asset allocation, and risk among state and local government-operated pension systems in the United States of America. It is argued that governance influences investment decisions and risk profiles of public

A Framework for Examining Asset Allocation Alpha

Recognising that different asset allocation portfolios are suitable for investors with different needs, Jason Hsu and Omid Shakernia think it is probably too ambitious to establish a unifying structure for determining benchmark asset allocation portfolios. Instead, they propose a framework for thinking about asset allocation alpha, assuming that investors have suitably determined their asset allocation policy portfolio. And the framework is:

A healthier way to de-risk

Defined-benefit funds all over the world are focused on de-risking but the amount of innovation and players to meet this demand is wanting. Until now. A new report by the Pensions Institute at the Cass Business School examines the emergence of medically enhanced, underwritten or enhanced, bulk buy-ins, in which trustees buy a bulk annuity

Raising ESG ratings with improved returns

While environmental, social and governance factors may be all the rage in investment strategies, the right tools to measure results of their implementation would make tangible what skeptics might think are the emperor’s new clothes. Cue researchers Zoltán Nagy, Doug Cogan and Dan Sinnreich from MSCI with their December 2012 paper, Optimizing ESG Risk Factors

GTAA and institutional investment management

The $70 billion AIMCo uses global tactical asset allocation to help add return in excess of passive portfolios. This research piece details how it has used GTAA over the past few years, advising other funds that executing a successful GTAA requires developing world-class talent, systems, process and governance.   To access the paper click below

How Norway’s SWF deals with FX tail risk

From a risk management perspective, tail risks and return distribution asymmetries of investments are important to analyse. Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) in this note describes a modelling approach that addresses some of the weaknesses of standard risk models. It uses the model internally as a complement to standard models to evaluate tail risk in foreign-exchange

Previous