TCorp pulls trigger on shake-up

TCorp has undergone a revolutionary reorganisation of its investment team that has resulted in many of its staff having to re-apply for their jobs.

TCorp, is the third largest institutional investor in Australia, behind the Future Fund and AustralianSuper, and manages the assets of the state of New South Wales. It was formed in 2015 by the amalgamation of State Super, TCorp and insurance funds.

The fund has been undergoing a comprehensive organisational restructure, under the guidance of Roger Urwin, global head of content at Willis Towers Watson, which has resulted in the re-organisation of its investment functions.

The TCorp investment team, previously organised along sector lines, will be more centralised around investment advisory, portfolio construction, exposure management and partner selection, chief investment officer Stewart Brentnall said.

The current positions of a number of staff will be terminated and those employees will be invited to join the new partner selection or portfolio construction teams, Brentnall confirmed.

The A$92 billion ($70 billion) TCorp investment team numbers 35 and will grow to about 55 in the next two years, Brentnall said.

Sponsored Content

Under the previous structure, TCorp’s strategic asset allocation work was centralised and the portfolio then passed on to sector teams to populate, with each team responsible for finding the right fund managers.

“This meant we had de-centralised portfolio construction and a large number of manager search and management processes,” Brentnall said.

Under the new structure, the investment and asset allocation team will be split into an investment advisory function – headed by Steve McKenna – and portfolio construction function yet to have a head appointed.

The investment advisory function will be where the initial set of investment decisions will be made with TCorp’s three clients – NSW Treasury, State Super and icare. This includes establishing investment objectives, liability analysis and determining the client’s detailed risk appetite.

“It is critical to understand the client, in a lot of depth and what their needs and constraints are,” Brentnall said.

The next phase in the new structure is portfolio construction, with a new leader for that function to be hired from outside the organisation.

TCorp’s portfolio construction team will be responsible for building a client-centric portfolio, analysing and constructing this from a “whole-of-portfolio” perspective, considering risk, cost, liquidity and “complexity” budgets.

“In my view, two things needed to change,” Brentnall said. “We needed portfolio construction to be fully centralised, where previously much of it was decentralised down to the sector level. And we needed partner selection to be a single, consistent process.”

Where individual sector teams were previously responsible for manager selection and monitoring, a partner selection team has now been established that will be responsible for all lifecycle management for all managers. A new head of the partner selection team, also yet to be appointed, will design a process to be consistent across all sectors, Brentnall said.

The partner selection team will also be responsible for embedding stewardship and environmental, social and governance concerns – led by Lucy Thomas – and for building and managing a strategic partnership program.

TCorp has about 80 manager relationships, and Brentnall said it was expected that there would be fewer managers, and more deep relationships, in the future as the model evolved.

The partner selection team will also be responsible for developing a peer engagement strategy for idea sharing, collaboration and co-investement.

TCorp manages about $25 billion in Australian cash and bonds in-house, plus about $12 billion in direct property and infrastructure.

There are no immediate plans to bring more assets in-house, Brentnall confirmed. Direct investments and cash and fixed income will not be affected by the restructuring and will remain direct reports to Brentnall.

The other change to the structure is that exposure management, which was previously outsourced, will now be managed in-house.

“The implementation of strategic asset allocation, tactical asset allocation, managers, daily cash flows and rebalancing will all be done internally,” Brentnall said.

This means investment implementation will move from operations into the investment team. General manager, investment implementation and operations, Jonathan Green, will leave the organisation after 13 years, and investment operations will now report to chief operating officer Paul Smith.

Green was instrumental in moving TCorp from three custodians to one custodian following the merger.

TCorp is also prioritising its technology strategy and delivery and will move that function from reporting to the COO to a seat at the executive committee level, reporting to chief executive Deverall. A new head of technology will also be recruited.

Brentnall said many organisations build their investment processes, measures, objectives and incentives around decentralised activities and measures that are not necessarily consistent with client objectives.

“What we are trying to do with our new structure is have clearer alignment of activities and processes so each part of the structure and operating model better relates to and serves our clients.”

Brentnall will have seven direct reports in the new structure, three of which are yet to be hired.

The aim is to have the first phase of the new structure complete by July 1 this year, with the expectation that several of the leadership positions may take a little longer to fill.

There will be a team of five in partner selection, a team of 10 in portfolio construction increasing to about 16 in two years, a team of six in investment advisory, a team of three in exposure management, a team of 10 in direct investments and a team of eight in cash and fixed income.

Leave a Comment

NY Common joins allocator push on company AI transparency

NY Common joins allocator push on company AI transparency

The $273 billion New York State Common has upped the pressure on portfolio companies to report on how artificial intelligence usage is contributing to layoffs, as AI governance becomes a growing focus in the proxy voting and engagement activities of asset owners.

Sort content by

CalPERS weighs incentives and benchmarks in battle for talent

As US public pension funds struggle to fill investment positions CalPERS' performance, compensation and talent management board committee meeting discussed compensation incentives and benchmarks, including a plan to introduce an annual incentive plan that focuses on total fund results for incentive eligible positions.

Fundamentally resetting reporting

WTW’s Thinking Ahead Institute has developed an alternative attribution tool giving investors a view on the long-term drivers of performance. Tim Hodgson explains the benefits of the open source tool including improved conversations between managers and asset owners about return drivers and providing clarity on how ESG objectives are managed.

Accelerating change: Operationalising DEI

Sarah Maynard global head of DEI at CFA Institute explains why the investment sector needs to operationalise a structured DEI approach and how including DEI in codes and standards will help bring about much-needed change.

Internalisation drives value added for large funds

Size matters in institutional investing, but how exactly does it result in better returns? Research by CEM Benchmarking shows large, internalised, active investors produce more net value added than small, externalised, passive investors. Internalising private markets is a significant predictor of value add.

Proposed US DoL rules on ESG ignore duty of impartiality

Fiduciary duty principles must be adaptive to change and the US has fallen behind. The authors argue that a more comprehensive application of fiduciary duty principles in the US is necessary to protect the life savings of ERISA plan participants. In particular impartiality is important for pension plans.

Norway’s SWF resembles index fund; needs clarity of mandate

The largest sovereign wealth fund in the world, Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global, resembles an index fund and is not making the most of its tracking error boundaries according to a review of the active management of the fund by a team of specialists who recommended more clarity of mandate.

Previous