HOOPP derives benefits to boost funding status

The extensive use of derivatives has been a big contributor to the C$35.7 billion ($37.4 billion) HOOPP reaching fully funded status. Jim Keohane, chief investment officer, explains how the fund manages its assets and liabilities through liability-hedging and return-seeking portfolios and the role derivatives play in dialling risk up, or down.

The moved to liability-driven investing a few years ago means HOOPP has two portfolios – the liability-hedging portfolio and the return-seeking portfolio. This structure allows the fund to extensively use derivatives in its portfolio, in fact Jim Keohane, chief investment officer says most of the portfolio exposure is through derivatives while most of the physical investments are in long-term sovereign bonds.

“Our move into derivatives started 10 to 12 years ago as a way to get around a foreign content rule, and we found there are a lot of things you can do with derivatives,” he says.

The fund almost stumbled into using credit default swaps, as at the time it thought Canadian credit was overpriced.

“The effect was it allowed us to reduce risk by diversifying credit and we improved return by decreasing risk.”

The fund recently released some good headline figures, announcing it was fully funded, and had returned 13.68 per cent for 2010. And it only has 35 investment professionals, keeping investment management costs down.

Sponsored Content

Risk is a big focus of the way the fund manages its assets, and the use of derivatives allows the investment staff to either take risk, or reduce risk.

“Derivatives consistently get a bad rap in the press, they’re just a tool. You can do woodwork with hand tools or use a radial-arm saw – which is very precise – and if I’m not trained I can cut my thumb off. But if you are properly trained they are more efficient in time and cost,” Keohane says.

He argues derivatives allow the fund to be more precise about the risk taken, for example in a US corporate bond investment there is credit risk, duration risk and foreign exchange risk, and through the use of derivatives any or all of those risks can be reduced or enhanced.

Within the risk management framework, HOOPP has identified that in its liability hedging portfolio – which has a 4.5 per cent return expectation – the liabilities are sensitive to interest rates and demographic factors. This is a minimum risk portfolio which is long only, with interest rate sensitive and inflation sensitive assets, including 30-year bonds, interest rate swaps, interest rate futures, real return bonds, real estate and private equity.

It also has a return-seeking portfolio which consists of a beta risk overlay, beta risk hedges and an alpha strategy. Within the beta risk overlay the fund uses S&P Futures, international futures, credit overlay CDX index and long-term options on the S&P 500. And the alpha strategies are equity-based strategies, interest rate strategies, funding strategy and cross-market arbitrage.

“It’s a two-step risk process. The liability hedge portfolio is a risk reduction portfolio. Interest rates, inflation and equity are the three major risks, and interest rates are almost as big as equities. For example a 100 basis points decrease in long rates would cost us $5 billion,” Keohane says.

The fund has a clear strategy to focus only on the areas of investment it does well, with Keohane pointing out it has a large balance sheet to allow collateral for shorting.

“We are making beta work for us and we focus where we strategic advantage over time,” he says.

The fund has a ‘vanilla’ portfolio, for example it does not invest in infrastructure, but acts more like an investment bank than a traditional pension fund investment division.

“We break down the barriers that exist within most funds, they’re siloed according to asset classes. We have one large public markets group, and we can figure out where next arbitrage might be globally. We can run hedge fund strategies internally and offer competitive pay. People have a lot of scope in their jobs, we hire those with bigger visions, searching for the next great ideas.”

Keohane believes there are a lot of investment myths out there that people blindly follow, one of those is that no one is good at big macro calls.

“We do what we are good at, which is identifying over- and undervalued securities, not being directional. For example we can determine the position of one bank relative to another but not whether banks generally will go up or down,” he says.

“We do certain things really well but don’t try to do everything. Running beta strategies with derivatives means you can run a large amount of money at a low cost.”

In 2010 the operating expenses of the fund were $129.2 million, down 1.6 per cent from $131.3 million in 2009, with the decrease primarily related to strategic initiatives and the elimination of external investment manager fees. HOOP’s investment operating cost work to just under 26 basis points and yet 80 cents of every dollar comes from investment returns.

The results speak for themselves. The fund is now fully funded with the effect that the contribution rates and benefits will be stable until at least the end of 2012.

The asset allocation December 31, 2010

 

Fixed income                         53.3 %

Cash and ST securities 1.6

Canadian equities                   10.1

US equities                             10.3

Non-North American equities        8.5

Real estate                    11

Private equity and special sit 5.2

Leave a Comment

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

PMT talks infra equity and how to balance stock concentration risk

Scenario testing has put inflation risk front and centre at PMT, the Netherlands’ third largest pension fund, and it's driving the investor to take stock of the inflation protection it gets from infrastructure. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, chief investment officer Hartwig Liersch unpacks the risk, as well as another initiative where it's balancing concentration risk in the equity allocation without hurting returns.

Sort content by

Dutch fund bolsters bonds, chills on bricks

Things are suddenly looking cheerful again in the world of Dutch pensions. The country’s famous tulip fields might not be set to bloom until April, but investors already have a harvest to delight at from a good year of investing. For instance, Hans de Ruiter, chief investment officer of the €2.5-billion ($3.36-billion) TNO pension fund

How is the Tesco fund faring aged one?

According to the latest figures, an ambitious turnaround plan at the United Kingdom’s biggest supermarket chain, Tesco, has helped reverse falling profits. Last year the retailer, one of Britain’s largest private sector employers and a landmark in every town since founder Jack Cohen opened his first store in North London in 1929, also changed strategy

Finnish fund diversifies out of Europe

Over the past five years, Finland’s 5.4 million people have watched with alarm as the eurozone they joined as founder members has descended into financial turmoil. So it is no surprise that Keva, which manages €34.4 billion ($47.1 billion) on behalf of Finland’s municipalities, as well as administering state and Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland

Vita Sammelstiftung puts bond holdings under microscope

Samuel Lisse, chief executive of Switzerland’s Vita Sammelstiftung (Vita), is currently in the process of hiring a new head of investment. The new appointee will have plenty resting in the in-tray, it appears, as she starts to assist the investment committee that governs the strategy of the 8.5-billion-Swiss-franc ($9.1-billion) joint foundation. That is not because

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

Environment Agency fund: a natural progression

It’s hardly surprising that a pension fund for employees working for an organisation charged with reducing climate change and its consequences invests according to strict green criteria. Yet the investment strategy of the United Kingdom’s £2.1-billion ($3.29 billion) Environment Agency Pension Fund (EAPF) definitely has the capacity to surprise. The EAPF posted a total return

Previous