APG hunts impact and returns in gender equity and climate action SDGs

A recent investment by APG, the €517 billion Dutch asset manager, in a Woman’s Livelihood Bond that provides access to capital for women entrepreneurs in Asia and Africa provides a compelling alternative to emerging market corporate and sovereign debt or DFI issuance.

The strategy also offers a window into how APG’s responsible investment strategy has evolved to incorporate impact – in this case advancing SDG 5 and 13, a nexus of gender equity and climate action respectively. APG began integrating the SDGs in 2015 following requests from its major client pension fund ABP whose beneficiaries work in the government and education sectors. and targets 20 per cent of its AUM in the SDGs.

Singapore-based IIX, Impact Investment Exchange, manages and oversees the loan disbursements to portfolio companies – the underlying borrowers – and is a corporate issuer itself. But APG’s $30 million investment is lower risk than typical emerging market corporate debt because it has developed market government-backed guarantees.

The underlying corporates have similar default probabilities of emerging market corporates, but with the prospect of much higher debt recovery rates, due to the participation of DFIs.

“IIX secured a government-backed partial guarantee from the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida), as well as support from the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC). That lowers the risk for investors compared to other emerging market corporates,” explains APG senior credit analyst and sustainability lead, Joshua Linder.

The investment also has relatively low volatility and little correlation with highly liquid credit investments in public markets. The bond priced with an annual coupon of 7.25 per cent.

Sponsored Content

In another facet of the strategy, it is easier to direct impact in this kind of structure compared to broad-brush emerging market investments.

“During our due diligence, we profiled each of the portfolio companies to ensure that the expected end beneficiaries align with client impact priorities. We also reviewed IIX’s historical track record for impact reporting, which includes surveys with representative samples of end beneficiaries. The detailed impact reporting – both from a quantitative and qualitative perspective – gives us further confidence,” says Linder.

Monitoring impact is one of the most complex challenges for impact investors. But APG responsible investment credit analyst, Lee Anne Hagel is impressed with IIX’s track record when it comes to reporting.

“As investors in this bond, it is crucial that we have transparency – detailed information on the activities our investment is funding and what is achieved in concrete terms. IIX uses pre-determined financial and social metrics, collects input from the end beneficiaries, and proactively verifies the impact data. In addition to annual financial reporting, we will also receive semi-annual impact reports on the individual borrowers we are lending to and on our investment as a whole,” she says.

Sustainability and digitisation are overarching themes shaping APG’s investment strategy, visible in a Sustainable Development Investment (SDI) Asset Owner Platform, driven by AI technology. The platform, launched in 2020, is designed to deliver on the SDGs and support positive outcomes. It has been created by investors for investors, and is shaped around innovation and cooperation.

Developed together with PGGM, the platform sifts through reams of structured and unstructured data to gauge the extent to which companies’ products and activities meet the SDGs.

The platform scores companies’ products and services rather than corporate conduct, the traditional ESG lens. Enthusiasts argue that SDG scores are better at integrating impact. For example, research shows that some companies with poor SDG scores can secure good ESG scores and ESG ratings can struggle to reflect positive impacts.

Meanwhile other investors like Bridgewater are increasingly incorporating risk, return and impact in a three dimensional model.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Why traditional investment committees can amplify group biases

Why traditional investment committees can amplify group biases

Investment committee meetings, a governance cornerstone at every asset owner organisation, run the risk of amplifying group biases and social dynamics, and can push the IC towards recommending more extreme investment positions collectively than the average of their individual views. Bernhard Scherer, head of portfolio implementation at ADIA, unpacks the thesis in a new paper.

Sort content by

SWFs play important role in Arctic

Sovereign wealth funds can play an important role in investing sustainably in the Arctic region, and warding off the impact of a looming natural disaster, according to the IMF's Udaibir Das.

Asset owners demand more ESG from GPs

ESG is a core expectation of LPs in assessing private equity managers, and some asset owners including AP2 are willing to forego opportunities if a manager is not transparent on ESG, a panel at PRI in Person discussed.

A roadmap for culture and purpose

This third article about the recently released CFA Institute report, the Investment Professional of the Future, looks at a roadmap for investment firms for developing culture and purpose. Specifically the report recommends that firms enhance the employee experience, invest in empowering leadership, and become change-savvy.

Hiding behind diversification

Modern portfolio theory has created the impression that diversification is always a good thing, but asset owners could benefit from a more sceptical attitude. This article suggests over-diversification favours managers at the expense of returns to investors.

CalPERS wrestles governance change

CalPERS is poised to reduce the number of investment committee meetings, and the size of the committee, as it strives to boost returns.

Texas Teachers revamps AA, adds leverage

The board of the $154 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas has approved changes to its strategic asset allocation as a result of its latest five-year study, increasing its allocation to private markets, risk parity and introducing leverage.

Previous