Economists call for targeted spending

Three prominent Chicago Booth economists have called for more targeted spending by the US government to more effectively manage the disruption to the economy, but they are not worried about inflation in the near term.

Austan Goolsbee, the Robert P Gwinn Professor of Economics at Chicago Booth and the former chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and a member of President Obama’s cabinet, says the virus is “the boss” and is still what is driving the economy.

“We should not be calling these bills ‘stimulus’ because they are not traditional stimulus. These are just rescue payments, they are disaster relief, once you realise that it becomes obvious that you give the money to the people who need it,” he says.

Goolsbee, who is named one of the 100 global leaders of tomorrow by the World Economic Forum, says that now, in the middle of the worst downturn on record and in what is possibly a double-dip recession, is not the time for governments to stop spending.

“It is not the time to tighten the belt. Governments should spend the money and direct it to the places it is most necessary. Tightening would completely miss the economic moment.”

Similarly Randall Kroszner, Deputy Dean for Executive Programs and the Norman P Bobins Professor of Economics at Chicago Booth says the government needs to move from policies that were ‘hopeful’ to those that are more targeted.

Sponsored Content

“It’s not just about spending more, it’s about where is the best bang for your buck,” he says.

Kroszner, who was a governor of the Federal Reserve from 2006 to 2009 and spoke at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium last year, says the government has to recognise that many sectors will not go back to where they were pre pandemic.

“The most recent jobs report shows there is a boom in tech but a significant contraction in hospitality and transport. It is hard to move people from one to the other. Some of those companies will have to shut down, and we need to provide support for those families and move on. That is hard for politicians to do, to move on. But we have to see that we need to provide support for people to move on, that is good for them as they get into productive work more quickly, and it is good for the economy.”

Raghuram Rajan, the Katherine Dusak Miller Distinguished Service Professor of Finance who was the 23rdGovernor of the Reserve Bank of India and was also formerly chief economist and director of research at the International Monetary Fund, says this is an opportunity for governments to concentrate on structural reform.

“Relief makes sense, but it has to be better targeted, a lot of money has gone to people who don’t need it,” he says pointing out that one option would be to extend unemployment insurance in sectors that are worse off.

“I am perturbed by the constant feeling this is all about stimulus. There is a need for serious structural reform in many countries including the US. It is clear the pandemic has exacerbated every inequality there was before. To that extent it is time to try and fix those sources of problems. How do we build back better, rethink education and infrastructure? It’s not so much about stimulus, but about how do we create sustainable growth in the medium to long term and focus on reforms.”

The economists called for a shift away from a focus on the headline spending number and a focus on where the relief is being spent.

“What you want is bang for buck: where are you spending it, not the amount you spend. Are you investing in human capital, infrastructure, what is the return and productivity of the investment, that is what will drive wages growth,” Kroszner says.

Goolsbee says the Federal Reserve has missed its inflation target for the past decade, and he continues to “not be afraid of inflation”.

“I don’t think the Fed should take its foot off the pedal because they are scared of inflation,” he says.

Similarly Rajan says the Fed won’t pre-empt anything to manage inflation.

“It will wait until it sees strong inflation and at that point it may act, but that probably won’t be over the next year,” he says.

Leave a Comment

Long Covid for the global economy

Long Covid for the global economy

Prevention is the balm for global economic shock, says respected central bank adviser Professor Warwick McKibbin who says the world’s economic future is uncertain and inflation is likely to remain under a persistent pandemic.

Sort content by

Wisconsin leans into opportunities

In the space of three months the State of Wisconsin Investment Board has moved its portfolio from “defensive” to “offensive” as it “leans into the opportunities” presented by the coronavirus crisis. CIO and executive director David Villa, and deputy, Rochelle Klaskin spoke to Amanda White about the portfolio and how the large internal team is managing remotely.

Meeting the social infrastructure need

The current coronavirus crisis has exposed many weaknesses, one of them being the chronic under-investment in social infrastructure in most countries – developed and emerging. So what can be done to make this more attractive for investors and meet the need?

Korean fund faces unique challenge

The KRW14.3 trillion ($12 billion) Korea Public Officials Benefit Association is sitting on more than 10 per cent cash, but in a unique challenge due to the coronavirus crisis, it is having trouble deploying capital. Amanda White spoke to CIO, Dong Hun Jang, about the options including listed alternatives and distressed opportunities.

Leading from the future

Empathy and compassion will be essential qualities for leaders in a post-COVID-19 world. These ways of being can not be learned, but founder of Authentic Investor, Rob Lake, discusses three ways to cultivate them.

Risk management in a time of crisis

Markets in disarray are where long-term investors make money. Investors that perform the best over the long term will have taken calculated and deliberate risks and put money to work during crises like this one. But how? Focusing Capital on the Long Term CEO and research director discuss.

COVID-19 leads to heightened scrutiny

A survey of Canada’s institutional investors representing C$2.3 trillion shows they are increasingly seeing the value in managing “S” issues and are asking deeper questions about the impacts of investments.

Previous