Is PE a superior form of ownership?

Almost exactly 30 years ago, a famous article by M
Continue Reading

Access the full content on Top1000funds.com

Join the global institutional investment platform read by the world's largest asset owners, fund managers and consultants.

New here

Create an account

Complimentary to register. We'll verify your details and grant access to the archive, our newsletters and the Asset Owner Directory (enhanced features coming soon).
Create your Top1000funds.com subscription account
Already a member

Sign in

Already activated your account? Sign in to continue reading and access your saved articles, preferences and member-only content.

One response to “Is PE a superior form of ownership?”

  1. davidmbrown1@hotmail.com

    The article highlights the wide variety of possible approaches within PE – So it is clearly not one homogeneous set of tactics and, as such, it is therefore difficult to gauge if PE is a “superior” or “inferior” form of ownership – simply because there is no “one” version of what we call PE. So, unless you want to analyse each declension of an array of PE strategies against listed (for being better or worse), perhaps a better question is – Does PE offer a wider variety of tools to achieve results than is possible from listed companies…? the answer to that is clearly yes – and therein lies its attraction. PE allows investors greater degrees of freedom to benefit from information asymmetries and undertake radical change within companies. The returns are therefore a risky set of change alphas that are unobtainable on the listed market. To the extent that these alphas are uncorrelated with the listed market, they act to benefit the diversification of total portfolios. this has been the experience of the majority of institutional investors who have been able to competently access this complicated space. The better the PE, the less correlated with listed, and the more virtuous it has been to include in the institution’s policy.

Leave a Comment

Rest Super’s selective approach to PE pays off as program comes of age

Rest Super’s selective approach to PE pays off as program comes of age

A concentrated bet on fewer, better GP relationships is paying off for one of Australia's largest superannuation funds. Built on selective manager and deal selection rather than a broad roster, the A$112 billion ($78 billion) Rest Super delivered private equity returns more than double the peer average last financial year, as the fund proactively courts top-tier PE firms instead of waiting to be approached.

Sort content by

Future Fund tops up PE, risk

Australia's $107 billion sovereign wealth fund added risk based on near-term outlooks and boosted its holdings in private equity, during a year in which it handily beat one-year and 10-year aims.

PE outperformance doesn’t add up

Thanks to recent history, flawed methodology and ill-chosen indices, most say PE consistently outdoes public equity. But the right data tells a different story, Oxford academics write.

Utah Retirement to pick PE managers

Utah Retirement Systems considers its strong balance sheet, history of long-term relationships with managers and nimble governance advantages as its search for GPs in private equity begins.

Alternative PE vehicles underperform

Alternative private equity vehicles underperform the associated main fund, new research from Harvard's Josh Lerner and MIT's Antoinette Schoar has shown for the first time - but skilled limited partners flip the script.

N. Mexico PERA adopts Wisconsin model

Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico CIO Dominic Garcia is headed down the path less travelled, employing a risk-parity and alpha strategy he learned with the State of Wisconsin.

CalPERS wants PE revamp to move quickly

The board of CalPERS is still wrestling with issues such as pay and level of control over its new private-equity entity. Meanwhile, opportunities could slip away if the launch is delayed.

Previous