Wurts polishes its silver

US consulting firm Wurts & Associates turns 25 this year, so Amanda White spoke to the founder, Bill Wurts, and managing director, Jeff MacLean, about the company’s transformation and the plans for the next quarter of a century.

1986 doesn’t seem that long ago, but it is, it’s 25 years. Like fashion, a lot has changed in that time, and just like fashion, a lot has come back around.

Back then, according to Bill Wurts – who before establishing his own firm had a 23-year history working for Merrill Lynch’s institutional division – performance measurement and evaluation were the prevailing consulting service.

While many services have been added to the toolkit since then, those skills are very much in vogue following the financial crisis and the subsequent focus on risk.

What has changed, according to Wurts who celebrates his firm’s 25th anniversary this year, is a dramatic improvement in service, with a wider range of services such as asset/liability modelling and asset allocation, as well as a change in fee models.

“It’s now a more complete consulting service, and a big change from just saying ‘here’s where you rank’, to ‘here’s where the problems are and this is how to solve them’,” Wurts says.

Sponsored Content

Wurts has a diverse range of clients, but most do not have big internal teams so rely on the consultant to make recommendations.

This has been the genesis for the firm to move more towards a discretionary model, and ultimately the development of multi-manager products.

“Every sponsor’s objectives are different, and we want to be able to provide a service for a client that doesn’t want to take the time or expertise to evaluate managers and make investment decisions. On the other hand there are still many Californian counties that want to make their own decisions,” he says.

“We have to have the capability to do more discretionary type services.”

Bill Wurts is still very much involved in the business he set up 25 years ago, and still has some client-facing responsibilities.

“I have a few old-line clients who still like to talk to an old man,” he says.

He still has ambitious plans, saying the company can grow at 20 per cent a year but he has handed over the day-to-day running of the business to Jeff MacLean.

MacLean, who joined Wurts with a plan to move back to his native Seattle but has been in Los Angeles since he joined in 1992, is the majority shareholder and manages the company’s 40-odd staff.

Like Wurts, he believes that implemented consulting will form a big part of the company’s future.

“Trustee boards don’t want to get into every decision of managing a portfolio. It can be very overwhelming for some clients, and they want a consultant to do it,” he says. “It will be a big part of our future.”

He concedes there are other types of clients that it won’t suit, but that the key is to developing and delivering capabilities for both.

The implemented consulting, that was only formed about a year ago, is fully customised to the liabilities of the individual plans, with a judgement about the sponsors’ contribution ability feeding into the funded status, with a subsequent asset allocation model that best matches those liabilities.

While MacLean believes consulting businesses in the US will continue to merge, it will also stay fragmented.

“This will be good for clients as some of the best work is done by key individuals with ownership.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous