Winners emerge from crowded field in UN PRI race

Six candidates have gained election to the advisory council of the UN PRI in a close-fought election that for the first time saw asset managers and service providers included.

There was strong interest in the elections for The Principles for Responsible Investment Initiative (PRI) Advisory Council, with more than 31 non-asset owner candidates for four positions and six asset owners for two positions.

It is understood more than 500 of the 920 signatories voted. Chief executive of investments at Dutch fund PFZW, Else Bos, and CalPERS board of administration member, Priya Sara Mathur, were the two asset owners elected to the 16-person council.

Aviva Investors UK chief executive, Paul Abberley, and Santander Asset Management Brazil, chief executive Luciane Ribeiro, were the two asset managers elected to the board.

Service providers won the remaining two places for non-asset owners. Responsible research director, Melissa Brown, and Australian Council of Superannuation Investors chief executive, Ann Byrne, were elected.

Under the rules governing regional representation on the council, Sopawadee Lertmanaschai from the Government Pension Fund of Thailand, John Oliphant from the Government Employers Pension Fund of South Africa, and Rene Sanda from Brazilian pension fund PREVI were automatically selected.

Sponsored Content

The PRI initiative was establish in 2006 and aims to promote responsible investment and ESG best practice.

Signatories agree to a voluntary set of six principles aimed at encouraging the incorporation of ESG aims into their organisations and the investment industry more broadly.

The PRI Advisory Council has been expanded to 16 positions drawn from the global signatory base.

It includes two UN representatives, nine asset owners from Europe, North America, Asia, Oceania, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. For the first time two investment managers and two service providers were included on the panel.

“The new governance structure marks a significant change for PRI, one that will benefit from the diverse representation of our asset owner, investment manager and service partner signatories in helping PRI realise its goals,” newly elected PRI Advisory Council Chair, Wolfgang Engshuber said.

One of two Australian representatives on the council, Bryne, who heads ACSI – a governance advisory organisation for the Australian superannuation industry – said she was focused on improving the practical focus of PRI and increasing its US membership.

“For us there are a couple of concerns and one is to make sure that the PRI is practically focused at implementing the principles and provides as much assistance as possible to its members,” Bryne said.

“But (it) does that in a practical way and shows an understanding of investment management processes and pension fund processes. The other big issue for the PRI is to increase the membership from the United States, there are so many assets in the US but there are not enough signatories who are focused on PRI principles in the US.”

US-based signatories to the UN PRI comprise of 19 asset owners, 83 asset managers and 27 service providers. This represents 14 per cent of signatories.

Overall 235 asset owners are signatories, 522 asset managers and 163 service providers.

Bryne said she also was focused on ensuring that the UN PRI was working appropriately with emerging market investors and asset managers.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous