Why you should take notice of what we write

New research released this month gives impetus to the evidence that newspaper articles can predict aggregate future stock returns.

Conducted by Professor of Finance at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, Manuel Ammann, it examines articles in the German finance paper, Handeslblatt, from July 1989 until March 2011, and overall found that “newspaper content is a valuable predictor for future DAX returns”.

While, typically, economic and financial data dominates the research of economists and analysts looking at future stock returns, the predictive power of newspaper articles can now join the fray.

While this research should be reason enough for you to want to read top1000funds.com, we’re also embarking on change in order to make your reading life easier.

This newsletter marks a new phase in our development – which includes not only new design but also new frequency in our delivery – as we endeavour to deliver in-depth industry analysis in a timely fashion. We will now send a newsletter to your inbox twice a week.

Sponsored Content

The research by the St Gallen academics has also given me cause to think about the influence and power of media, and how top1000funds.com can challenge its readership but also work with it to influence policy, investment practice and thinking for the greater good.

There have been other qualitative measures that look at the influence of newspaper articles including the The Economist’s informal R-word index which looks at the number of times the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times use the word “recession” in a quarter.

It claims that previous incarnations of the index identified the start of US recessions in 1990, 2001 and 2007.

There is also the “MarketPsych Fear Index” which is a 10-day exponential moving average of the percentage of “fear” words in the US financial news. The company that produces it also now publishes the “MarketPsych Fear Gauge” which is a real-time display of the fear expressed in financial social media.

Perhaps we can develop our own research measuring the influence of our work on this industry.

Certainly top1000funds.com aims to challenge “best practice”, industry norms, conventional thinking and methods of investment. We want to bring you information that is otherwise difficult to access, from your peers, industry observers and academics, looking sideways at the issues and the patterns of change.

As always we welcome your ideas, feedback and referrals. Let’s talk.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous