US providers face tough disclosure laws from July

Service providers in the US will be required to disclose any direct and indirect compensation to plan fiduciaries from July 16, 2011, under new regulations issued by the Department of Labour.

The US Department of Labour’s (DOL) Interim Final Regulation (IFR), issued last July, will enable plan fiduciaries to receive the information they need to make meaningful evaluations of the fees paid by their plans and plan participants.

The IFR requires existing contracts to disclose compensation by the July date, with new or renewed contracts after this date being disclosed before they are entered into and mid-contract changes within 60 days from the date the provider is aware of the change.

The rule comes after concerns were expressed by the DOL, Congress and the retirement industry over the lack of information provided to plan fiduciaries regarding their service providers’ complex compensation structures, making it difficult for these fiduciaries to comply with their fiduciary obligation to determine if fees are reasonable, and if any compensation arrangements involve conflicts of interest.

The rule is part of the DOL’s three-pronged program to address its concern regarding inadequate fee disclosure.

Plan fiduciaries will need to take the following steps to meet the July deadline:

Sponsored Content

1.     Identify all retirement plan service providers

2.     Request in writing the necessary information from each service provider

3.     Determine whether the service providers are “covered service providers”

4.     Follow up any covered service providers who do not provide the necessary information

5.     Evaluate the information received to assess the reasonableness of fees, potential conflicts of interest and other issues that may be revealed

6.     Document in meeting minutes in the second and third quarters of 2011 that the regulation’s requirements have been met

7.     Repeat annually – or at the time of contract changes if sooner

From the July deadline, plan fiduciaries who do not receive the required disclosures will have engaged in a prohibited transaction. However, due to the prohibited transaction exemption, plan fiduciaries will be relieved of any liability if they:

1.     request the necessary information in writing from the provider

2.     notify the DOL if the required information is not provided within 90 days, and

3.     formally evaluate whether the plan should continue to do business with the service provider.

In other DOL news, the department has issued proposed rules requiring additional disclosure on Qualified Default Investment Alternatives (QDIAs).

These proposed rules are aimed at making plan participants more aware of the asset allocations of the various age-based strategies, and how they will change over time; of the specific current age range targeted for the respective target retirement dates and any assumptions made about the participant’s contributions and withdrawals after the target date; and that the participant and their beneficiaries may incur losses and the age-based strategy does not guarantee that there will be sufficient assets for retirement on the target date.

Similar changes have also been proposed for the original QDIA regulations and corresponding requirements have been proposed for the participant fee disclosure rules when individual account plans offer target date or similar investment alternatives.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous