Top pension ranking elusive

The Netherlands retains its number one ranking in the third Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, but the elusive A-grade is yet to be achieved by any country measured in the index.

David Knox

Senior partner at Mercer and author of the report, David Knox (pictured), says The Netherlands does a couple of things very well and their overall governance and structure is good.

“They have a good base pension, and a good replacement rate for the median earner. They also have high coverage of the workforce, and level of assets proportionate to GDP is high,” Knox says.

The current reform in The Netherlands, which will increase the pension and retirement age, will serve to increase the country’s ranking in the index, he says.

But the index reveals that there is no perfect retirement system; many of the world’s systems are under significant stress; and even the world’s most advanced retirement income systems require ongoing reform to ensure they are robust.

Knox says there are a couple of common reform agendas that would improve the systems around the world.

Sponsored Content

“There needs to be recognition of the aging population, and an increase in the state pension age or retirement age,” he says. “If people are working longer then adequacy is increased and they are drawing down for fewer years.”

The US, the UK and Australia have all indicated moves to encourage greater labour force participation, he says.

Also, there could be encouragement of a higher coverage of private pensions globally, Knox says.

“In some countries it covers only half the workforce,” he says.

Knox, who will present at next week’s International Centre for Pension Management (ICPM) conference in Washington, says he hopes the Mercer index will be a document considered by policy makers around the globe.

ICPM will also hear from Richard Jackson, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, where he directs the Global Aging Initiative and prepares the Global Aging Preparedness Index, which provides a quantitative assessment of the progress 20 countries are making in preparing for global aging.

In the Mercer index, there is limited ranking with regard to investments, but countries are scored on their allocation to growth assets.

Knox says Mercer believes between 50 and 60 per cent of a country’s pension assets should be in growth assets, as an indication of diversification. Countries get penalised for being outside, on either side, of that range.

Australia, for example, has more than 60 per cent allocated to growth assets and was rated down because of that.

This year Mercer included a “Gold Standard” as an indication on how to achieve the elusive A-grade.

“We attempted to show for a developed economy which applies regulation and the introduction of appropriate policies, it is possible to reach the A-grade,” he says.

The Mercer report, now in its third year, is funded by the state government of Victoria, and one of the conditions of continued funding was that two additional countries were added each year.

This year Poland and India were included, and next year Korea and Denmark are slated for inclusion.

The index is calculated by assigning values to adequacy, sustainability and integrity. About half of the index questions are sourced from international groups, such as the IMF and the OECD, while the other half are sourced through Mercer.

“We try to break it down into simple questions to reduce subjectivity,” he says.

 

 

 

Global Pension Index

 

Country           2011    2010    2009

Netherlands     1          1          1

Australia          1          4          2

Switzerland     3          2          –

Sweden           4          3          3

Canada                        5          5          4

UK                  6          6          5

Chile                7          7          7

Poland             8          –           –

Brazil               9          8          –

USA                10        10        6

Singapore        11        9          8

France             12        11        –

Germany         13        12        9

Japan               14        13        11

India                15        –           –

China               16        14        10

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous