Top pension ranking elusive

The Netherlands retains its number one ranking in the third Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, but the elusive A-grade is yet to be achieved by any country measured in the index.

David Knox

Senior partner at Mercer and author of the report, David Knox (pictured), says The Netherlands does a couple of things very well and their overall governance and structure is good.

“They have a good base pension, and a good replacement rate for the median earner. They also have high coverage of the workforce, and level of assets proportionate to GDP is high,” Knox says.

The current reform in The Netherlands, which will increase the pension and retirement age, will serve to increase the country’s ranking in the index, he says.

But the index reveals that there is no perfect retirement system; many of the world’s systems are under significant stress; and even the world’s most advanced retirement income systems require ongoing reform to ensure they are robust.

Knox says there are a couple of common reform agendas that would improve the systems around the world.

Sponsored Content

“There needs to be recognition of the aging population, and an increase in the state pension age or retirement age,” he says. “If people are working longer then adequacy is increased and they are drawing down for fewer years.”

The US, the UK and Australia have all indicated moves to encourage greater labour force participation, he says.

Also, there could be encouragement of a higher coverage of private pensions globally, Knox says.

“In some countries it covers only half the workforce,” he says.

Knox, who will present at next week’s International Centre for Pension Management (ICPM) conference in Washington, says he hopes the Mercer index will be a document considered by policy makers around the globe.

ICPM will also hear from Richard Jackson, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, where he directs the Global Aging Initiative and prepares the Global Aging Preparedness Index, which provides a quantitative assessment of the progress 20 countries are making in preparing for global aging.

In the Mercer index, there is limited ranking with regard to investments, but countries are scored on their allocation to growth assets.

Knox says Mercer believes between 50 and 60 per cent of a country’s pension assets should be in growth assets, as an indication of diversification. Countries get penalised for being outside, on either side, of that range.

Australia, for example, has more than 60 per cent allocated to growth assets and was rated down because of that.

This year Mercer included a “Gold Standard” as an indication on how to achieve the elusive A-grade.

“We attempted to show for a developed economy which applies regulation and the introduction of appropriate policies, it is possible to reach the A-grade,” he says.

The Mercer report, now in its third year, is funded by the state government of Victoria, and one of the conditions of continued funding was that two additional countries were added each year.

This year Poland and India were included, and next year Korea and Denmark are slated for inclusion.

The index is calculated by assigning values to adequacy, sustainability and integrity. About half of the index questions are sourced from international groups, such as the IMF and the OECD, while the other half are sourced through Mercer.

“We try to break it down into simple questions to reduce subjectivity,” he says.

 

 

 

Global Pension Index

 

Country           2011    2010    2009

Netherlands     1          1          1

Australia          1          4          2

Switzerland     3          2          –

Sweden           4          3          3

Canada                        5          5          4

UK                  6          6          5

Chile                7          7          7

Poland             8          –           –

Brazil               9          8          –

USA                10        10        6

Singapore        11        9          8

France             12        11        –

Germany         13        12        9

Japan               14        13        11

India                15        –           –

China               16        14        10

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Washington State prioritises excellence

The $70.5 billion Washington State Investment Board has prioritised hiring the best managers in public equities and is willing to sacrifice the number of active investment relationships in lieu of the managers it believes are “truly exceptional” as it enters 2010 with plans for global manager searches. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS sets investment strategy

The $206 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) set its investment strategy roadmap for 2010 at a board offsite last week, as chief investment officer, Joe Dear, attributes strong gains in 2009 to a “sharpened investment focus”. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Back to normal

In this research brief, Tim Barron suggests the entire notion of the “new normal” being somehow different is an exaggeration or an embellishment. He says there is nothing “new” about this normal but it is more appropriately described as “back to normal.” And, that if it lasts for three or more years, it will then

Passive tilt for Massachusetts state fund

The $42 billion Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Management (PRIM) will move half of its developed non-US equity portfolio and 25 per cent of its emerging market equity portfolio into passive strategies and has begun a search for a single manager for each asset class with a commencement date of May. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2

Ontario Teachers’ buys UK schools from private equity

The private capital arm of the $87.4 billion Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP) has acquired a UK special education and fostering services provider believed to be valued at about £200 million ($326 million).   mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Make companies pay for engagement

Businesses should be forced to pay a levy to support robust shareholder engagement, says Peter Butler, chief executive of Governance for Owners (GO), a UK shareholder rights partnership, because effective stewardship will only become a fixture of the institutional investment industry when it carries a big price tag. He spoke with Simon Mumme. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous