TMX rejects funds’ bid amid debt concerns

Competition and debt concerns have scuttled an ambitious proposal by a consortium of nine Canadian banks and pension funds to acquire the country’s biggest stock exchange.The group of four Canadian banks and five pension funds made a $3.7 billion counterbid to a proposed merger between the London Stock Exchange and TMX Group – the owners of the Toronto and Montreal Stock exchange.

TMX Group rejected the bid last week amid concerns it could diminish competition and stymie the exchange’s expansion ambitions.

Peter Block, a spokesman for the consortium, which is known as the Maple Acquisition Corporation, said it was disappointed that TMX Group had refused to enter into discussions with them and they were deciding their next move.

The attempt to acquire the exchange came amid concerns that the LSE offer was, in fact, a foreign takeover of the exchange and would move a measure of control over Canada’s financial markets offshore.

The Maple bid was promoted as an “All-Canadian” solution that would create a new group owned 60 per cent by the domestic pension funds and banks.

The pension funds involved were the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, the Caisse de depot et placement du Quebec, Alberta Investment Management Co and the Fonds de solidarite des travailleurs du Quebec.

Sponsored Content

Their involvement would have constituted approximately 35 per cent of the bid, with banks making up the remaining 25 per cent. Existing shareholders would make up the remaining 40 per cent of the proposed new company.

In an effort to address potential conflict of interest no one shareholder in the consortium could own more than 10 per cent of the company.

Block said the Maple consortium believed the structure of the deal would provide for a range of interests and would be further strengthened by securities regulations that require half of the TMX board to be independent directors.

While not prepared to speak directly to why pension funds felt that investment was good for members, Block said the investors felt there was good value in TMX and its future growth potential.

“Each of the Maple investors is doing this because they see an opportunity to create significant value for their respective shareholders or plan beneficiaries by creating a stronger, more integrated and more valuable exchange business,” Block said.

“While the business decision regarding value creation is the paramount focus for each of the investors, we believe our proposal delivers a superior outcome for the TMX and all of its stakeholders.”

In a statement explaining its rejection of the Maple bid, the TMX board said it could raise substantial anti-trust risks with authorities, which may move to block the acquisition of Canada’s largest exchange.

It also raised concerns about the debt needed to finance the cash component of the deal, which they claimed would be a drag on the company’s ambitions to seek expansion opportunities abroad.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous