The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds

The world’s largest institutional investors are increasingly building their own home-region private equity programs, but turning to fund-of-funds for the rest of the world particularly when it comes to Asia, says a Hong Kong-based partner of the first fund-of funds to ever build a product covering that region.

Sally Collier, who recently moved to Hong Kong as a partner of Pantheon Private Equity, said the “mega buy-out” managers who enjoyed a heyday in 2006-7 often had global presences, large capacity and were relatively accessible for researchers.

However, those managers were “no longer flavour of the month”, and demand had now shifted to the less-leveraged players in the middle market.

“The challenge here is that these players might only be raising $1.5 to 2 billion per fund, and they are becoming oversubscribed,” Collier said. “They’re the ones that take serious resources to find and access.”

Many of these “growth-oriented” mid-market private equity general partners were popping up in China and India, Collier said, where there was really no buy-out market to speak of.

Pantheon launched its first Asian private equity fund-of-funds in 1994, and raised its last one in 2006, closing it at $800 million for the seven-year closed-end vehicle.

Sponsored Content

Collier defended the private equity practice of charging fees on committed capital before it was invested, saying that to do otherwise would encourage general partners to make deals no matter what.

“As 2007 progressed our managers slowed down on new investments, and it was that fee structure which allowed them to do that.”

The Pantheon partner did allow that more “fee discussions” were happening in the cost conscious age following the global financial crisis.

She cited the recent example of a Missouri-based institution bargaining a private equity manager into paying 80 per cent of transaction costs for deals made on its behalf, where the historical norm has been a 50:50 split between the general and limited partners.

One response to “The more foreign the market, the more funds-of-funds”

  1. It makes sense that funds of fund become a norm. It lower fees and ease of management will benefit investors.

    ifund

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous