Texas Teachers rejects independent risk officer

The $105 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas has debated, and rejected, the idea of appointing an independent chief risk officer outside of the investment management division, with the board deciding oversight of risk is sufficient within its current practices.

The consideration of an independent risk officer, reporting to the executive director, is a hangover from a review by the Investment Training and Consulting Institute, which was hired by the fund chief audit executive to do a comparative study on the use of derivatives trading and external managers a couple of years ago.

As part of the ITCI’s recommendations it advised the TRS to consider creating a new chief risk officer who would report directly to the executive director and be segregated from direct oversight by the chief investment officer.

Action on this recommendation was deferred until the transformation of the investment division, as laid out in 2007 by the then new chief investment officer Britt Harris.

That transformation, which has included diversifying the portfolio by reducing the dependency on public equities and increasing the allocation to alternatives, adding alpha by more actively managing the portfolio, appointing new staff, systems and processes, has now been complete.

In a board debate it was decided the internal auditor, risk committee and the culture of the board which included trustees with investment knowledge was sufficient to oversee the investment division and its risks.

Sponsored Content

Some of those functions and procedures, including the independent risk committee, were not in place at the time of the original recommendation.

Meanwhile the fund has appointed Brian Guthrie as its new executive director to replace Ronnie Jung from September. Jung has agreed to serve as executive liaison to the TRS board during a period of transition to the end of January 2012.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous