Texas Teachers looks to hedge bets in low-returns world

Teacher Retirement System of Texas (TRS) will look to investments in hedge funds to maintain its position as one of the best performing public pension funds in the United States, its chief investment officer Britt Harris told trustees at its recent board meeting.

While the $109 billion fund had achieved strong returns so far this year, Harris warned trustees that they were entering a challenging returns environment, where long-term investors had to be prepared for a bumpy ride in volatile markets.

Harris said that in a volatile investing environment, hedge funds provided a vehicle that gave his pension fund more flexibility.

The fund had recently gained approval to lift the amount it was allowed to invest in hedge funds from 5 per cent to 10 per cent of the total value of its investments.

“If you believe that the risk premium will be there and you are going to get a decent return out of stocks, you can stay in the game long enough and you can stand the short-term volatility then that works fine,” he told trustees.

“But we are entering a part of the market where returns are down and there is more volatility, so we need more flexibility and this is what a good conservative hedge fund does.”

Sponsored Content

Harris said they were looking at a number of  hedge fund strategies and aimed to have their suite of hedge fund investments up and running by the end of the year.

In 2010 the fund had $4.1 billion invested in a range of hedge fund strategies. This made up 4.1 per cent of its total asset allocation.

In its 2010 annual report, TRS said it had structured its hedge fund strategy to reduce downside equity market risk.

Harris and the investment team were riding high on the back of returns that TRS said made it $15 billion in the year to March 31.

TRS said in its recent quarterly report that this 15.9 per cent yearly return put them in the top 8 per cent of public funds in the US.

The returns were driven primarily by a successful tactical bet which resulted in an overweight position to credit and an underweighting of 5.5 per cent to long treasury bonds for much of last year.

The investments were mainly in dislocated credit.

This resulted in a yearly return that was 150 basis points above the fund’s index.

In the first quarter of the year they also outperformed their index by 30 basis points, making $4.4 billion from their investments and achieving a 4.2 per cent return to March 31.

Harris said that, while other funds had seen the opportunity in credit, many had not achieved the results that TRS did because they did not bet big enough.

“Most people had some money in this trade but most didn’t put anywhere near enough in,” Harris told trustees.

Of the 150 basis points of returns it achieved for the year above its benchmark, TRS said 90 basis points was due to asset allocation and 60 basis points was due to stock selection.

As of March 31 TRS had a risk position that was underweight treasury (-3.8 per cent), private equities (-1 per cent) and TIPS (-1 per cent). It was neutral on hedge funds, cash, REITs and real assets and was overweight credit (+3.2 per cent), public equity (+2.5 per cent) and commodities (+0.8 per cent).

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous