Tennessee plans asset allocation review

The Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System will conduct an asset allocation and portfolio implementation review, with an equities increase and reorganisation of the fixed income portfolio a likely outcome, as it investigates how to increase the returns of the fund at a strategic level.

The $29 billion fund is looking to increase its equity allocation as part of this review from 55 to 65 per cent of assets, up from its current position of around 50 per cent.

The fund is also looking at eliminating short-duration fixed income, adding non-investment grade fixed income and continuing to increase real estate.

The fund will also search for a general and private equity consultant.

TCRS returned 14.2 per cent for the year, which was an underperformance of 2.1 per cent against its allocation index.

Sponsored Content

Tactical asset allocation was the key drag and subtracted 4 per cent for 2009, with other negative contributing areas including domestic equities and international equities.

Domestic fixed income was the best performer for the fund, up 9 per cent for the year to the end of 2009.

At the March investment committee it was disclosed that the fund is looking to increase returns by a strategic increase of the equity mandate and modifying the domestic and international fixed income mandates.
Other plans include adding to private equity as an asset  class, by way of adding a distressed fund, a mezzanine fund, a small buyout fund, and another venture capital  fund.

The fund  also  has a goal  to  invest  up  to $1  billion  in  real estate over the next  five  years, and  is  also  exploring  the idea of launching a Canadian equity fund.

At the end of 2009 the fund had 2.7 per cent in short-term, 3.3 per cent in real estate, 7.9 per cent in inflation-hedged bonds,3.6 per cent in international fixed income, 33.4 per cent in US fixed income, 14.5 per cent in international equity, and 34.6 per cent in US equity.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous