SWF investors in Citi to face dilemma if US govt ups its stake

Greater US government ownership of Citigroup could bring a dilemma to one of the troubled bank’s major stakeholders, the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC), according to US financial services consultancy Aite group.

Further government ownership of Citigroup, which seems imminent, would probably direct the bank’s corporate strategy towards the US market and dilute the value of the US$6.88 billion investment made by GIC at the outset of the financial crisis, Denise Valentine, senior analyst with Aite Group, said.

“SWFs investing in Citi have watched their investment go from very bad to much worse,” Valentine said.

“US government ownership of the bank will influence Citi’s strategy in the future.”

In a statement, the consultancy said Citi was likely to execute a strategic “pullback” into its domestic market in the US government increased its stake in the bank.

Sponsored Content

Valentine said that GIC and other sovereign wealth fund investors in Citi were likely to keep their cumulative 7 per cent convertible bond stakes because “the prospect of stock ownership in a $2 per share company [that is] selling off assets is not good”.

“A conversion of preferred shares to common shares will dilute the SWF’s share.”

Current discussions between Citi and the US regulators could see as much as 40 per cent of the bank owned by the federal government.

The US government has already thrown two lifelines to the troubled financial conglomerate since the financial crisis began.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous