SWF investors in Citi to face dilemma if US govt ups its stake

Greater US government ownership of Citigroup could bring a dilemma to one of the troubled bank’s major stakeholders, the Government of Singapore Investment Corporation (GIC), according to US financial services consultancy Aite group.

Further government ownership of Citigroup, which seems imminent, would probably direct the bank’s corporate strategy towards the US market and dilute the value of the US$6.88 billion investment made by GIC at the outset of the financial crisis, Denise Valentine, senior analyst with Aite Group, said.

“SWFs investing in Citi have watched their investment go from very bad to much worse,” Valentine said.

“US government ownership of the bank will influence Citi’s strategy in the future.”

In a statement, the consultancy said Citi was likely to execute a strategic “pullback” into its domestic market in the US government increased its stake in the bank.

Sponsored Content

Valentine said that GIC and other sovereign wealth fund investors in Citi were likely to keep their cumulative 7 per cent convertible bond stakes because “the prospect of stock ownership in a $2 per share company [that is] selling off assets is not good”.

“A conversion of preferred shares to common shares will dilute the SWF’s share.”

Current discussions between Citi and the US regulators could see as much as 40 per cent of the bank owned by the federal government.

The US government has already thrown two lifelines to the troubled financial conglomerate since the financial crisis began.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous