State Street goes uber-global

After one year in the job, State Street’s boss, Jay Hooley (pictured), surveys the post-crisis landscape and looks at the trends for investors and fund managers. He spoke with Greg Bright.

State Street, the Boston-based global bank and fund manager, is aiming to have more than half its revenue coming from non-US sources within five years, with Asia Pacific growth expected to figure prominently.

That implies a “heady” annual revenue growth rate in the mid-teens, compound, to lift the non-US share of total revenue from its current level of about 40 per cent, according to Hooley.

Hooley, State Street’s chairman, president and chief executive, took over the firm’s top job on March 1 last year, after several years of running the global services division. He believes his company has positioned itself well after the storm.

“We’re well-positioned in a financial sense,” he says. “We are one of the best-capitalised financial institutions. We’re also well-positioned in a strategic sense.”

State Street is expecting a continuation of the trend among big pension funds to employ a range of beta strategies coupled with an increasing use of alternatives, rather than a traditional active core approach for broad market equities and bonds.

Sponsored Content

“That portends well for us,” Hooley says.

State Street’s funds management arm, State Street Global Advisors (SSgA), is a quantitative manager with strong links to academia. It not only has one of the world’s largest cap-weighted index portfolios but also offers index-like strategies with various “active” tilts. At the other end of the spectrum it offers hedge fund-like long/short strategies.

Like other quant managers, the firm was an early sufferer in the global crisis. In August 2007 most quant managers, including SSgA, suffered a sharp fall in performance due to a combination of factors coming together under a weight of too much money. Since then, the quants have adapted their models and conditions have changed significantly such that performance has largely returned.

Hooley says: “We had a 100-year storm that no-one predicted. We went through a difficult cycle and we’ll be smarter for it. We’re comfortable in our space.”

He points out, however, that the firm will continue to look selectively for different styles of funds management to introduce to its range according to client demand.

It has recently concluded the acquisition, for instance, of Bank of Ireland’s global funds management arm, which is a traditional active manager.

Hooley says that pension fund trustees and management are increasingly looking for more comprehensive solutions, bringing together multiple strategies to produce an outcome. This is also a trend which suits State Street.

The firm’s State Street Associates academic team and Advanced Research Centre allow it to design models to produce optimum outcomes given certain risk tolerances, he says. The trends for lifestyle funds and liability driven investments in the US are driving demand in this regard.

While funds management may continue to be fragmented with demand for alternatives and capacity-constrained strategies, Hooley believes the asset servicing sector, including core custody, may see some further consolidation.

Currently, the big four custodian banks have about 70 per cent of the asset servicing market globally. Not only are regulators around the world looking at the banks for capital adequacy and other signs of weakness, but also many of the banks themselves are looking at their portfolio of businesses to see where they can best compete.

“It’s a scale business which requires continuous investment in IT and systems,” Hooley says. “We’ve never stopped spending 20-25 per cent (of revenue) each year throughout the cycle.”

That equates to more than $1 billion a year. Recent spending has had a focus on “cloud” computing, which offers not only cost savings but also much greater speed to market and innovation around data.

State Street has built its own private “cloud” rather than use a public one such as Google’s.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous