Securities body ramps up risk surveillance

Securities watchdog, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), has revamped its structure to better identify market risks and develop regulatory standards for capital markets.

IOSCO has approved a new structure and funding so it can continue to “provide the lead in the development of regulatory standards for capital markets”, said Jane Diplock, chair of IOSCO’s executive committee.

The funding changes were to ensure that IOSCO had the resources to identify emerging securities markets risks and could respond to requests for targeted work by the G20 and the Financial Stability Board.

After last week’s IOSCO conference in Cape Town, Diplock said that securities markets did not “as many market participants once fondly believed” regulate themselves. “Regulation must play its part – regulation that aims at sustaining the financial system and preventing individuals and businesses from exploiting and weakening it, even bringing it to its knees.”

She said IOSCO was now recognised as the standard setter for securities markets regulation by the G20 and international financial institutions.

The decision to re-structure and re-fund ensured that IOSCO could meet those challenges.

Sponsored Content

Diplock said that the power of IOSCO’s Objectives and Principles for Securities Regulation were in the fact that they were internationally agreed and nationally applicable. “Unlike some other global multilateral efforts which have stalled,” she said, “IOSCO has made significant progress in global standard-setting.

“This is why the G20 has mandated full implementation of the IOSCO Principles in every G20 country and encouraged their use in all others.”

Diplock pointed to what she called IOSCO’s other success story: the development and implementation of a global protocol, the IOSCO MoU, for the exchange of information needed to police and sanction market misconduct.

Of the 122 member regulators, 80 now fully meet the MoU’s requirements and were “engaged in combating fraudulent market activity and its consequences for investors”, Diplock said.

Diplock, who is chair of the soon-to-be-disbanded New Zealand Securities Commission, will stand down this week after 10 years at the NZSC. The irony is that, during this position, she was nicknamed Plane Jane due to the amount of time she spent overseas as the executive chairman of IOSCO.

The New Zealand Shareholders’ Association said the country’s securities commission had failed.The association’s chairman, John Hawkins, described the regulator as a “late-arriving ambulance at the bottom of the cliff”.

Hawkins doubted that Diplock achieved the two main tasks of setting “boundaries of acceptable behaviour in the market” and enforcing the rules.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Rethinking investment performance attribution

As asset owners move away from silo-based investment decision making, their performance attribution systems also need to evolve. The Alberta Investment Management Corporation AimCo, the C$70 billion arm’s length investment manager for public sector assets in Alberta, Canada, has implemented a new performance attribution system based on how managers actually make their investment decisions.  

Benchmark design for an active investment process

Choosing the appropriate benchmark for active managers is a common debate among institutional investors. Norges Bank Investment Management has produced a “discussion note’ on the benchmark design for an active investment process, in which it introduces a flexible modelling framework that aims to incentivise each portfolio manager to utilise their stock-picking skill.   The benchmark

SSgA focuses on innovation not assets

For Scott Powers, president and chief executive of State Street Global Advisors, assets under management is not a measure of success – the manager is currently the world’s fourth largest with around $2.5 trillion. Instead it is the ability to provide value for clients in meeting their objectives – whether it be matching liabilities, creating

Pension funds put pressure on G20 tax reform

Pension funds are becoming vocal ahead of the G20 leaders summit next week, reiterating the need for action over tax reform, and encouraging world leaders to consider financial reform that encourages long-term investing. The UK’s Local Authority Pension Fund Forum, which is a collaborative shareholder engagement group of 61 local authority pension funds with combined

G20 urged to develop policies to support long-term investment

The Fiduciary Investors Symposium (FIS) at Harvard University has identified several of the key barriers to pension funds, endowments and sovereign wealth funds adopting more effective long-term and sustainable investment strategies, and is preparing a communiqué to the upcoming meeting of the G20 to convey its concerns and its policy requirements. FIS, organised and hosted

Future Fund focuses on finding the best people

Australia’s sovereign wealth fund, the A$101 billion Future Fund, has just upped the stakes in not only attracting the best co-investment deals from fund managers, but in its bid to attract the world’s best investment professionals. Two months ago the fund’s long serving chief investment officer, David Neal, become chief executive in name (following the

Previous