Russell changes tune on TAA

After a long history of opposition to tactical asset allocation, Russell Investments has not become a convert but is allowing for a “slower twitch” version of the discipline, says global chief investment officer of the consultant and multimanager, Peter Gunning.

An Australian now resident in Tacoma Beach, Gunning said he had come to appreciate the “rules-based culture” of the United States, and said applying it more to investing could help portfolios “stop falling prey to human emotion”.

Gunning used historical data on US small caps to show that one year of active underperformance by a manager, enough to get them sacked by many investors, was typically followed by three years of outperformance.

Gunning said this monitoring of the cycles of active management was now incorporated into Russell’s multimanager process as a way of reducing behavioural biases.

The suitability of individual markets for active management are also taken into account – for instance UK equities is one of the worst asset classes in the world for active management, in Russell’s opinion, because it has high local investor sophistication, high reporting frequency for companies (less room for price discovery), a relatively narrow and relatively concentrated benchmark, and high transaction costs (at least 50bps a trade, Gunning says).

Sponsored Content

Gunning said Russell is shifting internal resources toward areas of larger alpha opportunity, and expanding its research universe into new betas such as closed-end funds, green investing, natural resources, public private partnerships, agriculture and, through the “Edge Strategies Group” established by Gunning, insurance-based asset classes such as catastrophe bonds.

He made it clear that Russell, which has $151 billion in assets under management, was prepared to only take passive exposure to areas where it could sense no competitive advantage in eking out alpha.

Gunning also advised against auto-rebalancing, saying Russell had developed the ability to take tilts of up to 5 per cent away from long-term strategic asset allocation in its global diversified funds.

Russell has to manage this discretion carefully, advising its “traditional” advisory clients of its plans before implementing the tilts in its funds.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous