Rebalancing not so simple with diverse beta sources

Simple reblancing of portfolios back to strategic ranges after a market rise or fall is not as simple as you may think, according to a research note from brokers Morgan Stanley. The new investment required after a fall may be surprisingly large.

Morgan Stanley has long been an advocate of slow rebalancing by pension funds and in the latest research note the broker says that when a fund uses a slow rebalancing strategy, the portfolios with a high beta variance enjoy the greatest positive “convexity” in asset value.

What this means is that certain portfolios, such as those with a high dispersion of beta sources – with high beta variance – will lead to more desirable lower betas in falling markets and higher beta values in rising markets.

The researchers say that the movement of a fund’s beta from its intended value can involve a “second order convexity” effect depending on the distribution of beta components within the portfolio, giving an extra kick to the movement.

This affects the amount of rebalancing needed to bring the portfolio back to its target beta after a market move.

“Rebalancing liquidity is often underestimated,” they say. “For example, after a 30 per cent market decline, a 7 per cent equity purchase is needed to bring a standard 60:40 portfolio back to its initial 60 per cent equity exposure. With higher convexity, the required liquidity for rebalancing would be even greater.”

Sponsored Content

It is more difficult and complicated controlling tracking error and maintaining a prescribed beta target for funds with high beta variance, with a high dispersion of beta sources.

“On the other hand, a high beta variance leads to the more desirable beta values in falling markets and higher beta values in rising markets,” the researchers say.

The beta shift after a market move can be directionally asymmetrical and surprisingly large in magnitude. But the “second order convexity” effect can also come into play, depending on the specific distribution of beta components within the portfolio.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Harvard endowment hones managers

Harvard Management Company will increase manager concentration levels, look closely at commodities and real estate, and bring more assets in-house where appropriate, as it moves into fiscal year 2011 with an unchanged long-term asset allocation.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

New world order: Mercer offers its blueprint to cope

Mercer Investment Consulting has produced its foreshadowed paper on global equities, which urges clients to have a major rethink about their benchmarks and portfolio construction. Greg Bright spoke with the paper’s main author, Nick White.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Future Fund chief departs, alternative weightings increase

Four years after becoming its first employee, Paul Costello will leave his role as general manager of Australia’s Future Fund, saying “new leadership” was appropriate now that the A$87 billion ($81.2 billion) vehicle was beyond its “startup phase.” mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Commodities and emerging markets funds will run the gauntlet

There are eight “gauntlets” that any managed fund will have to run over the medium term,  according to Investec Asset Management investment strategist Michael Power, and while a Japanese equity fund might be lucky to meet one of them, funds investing in commodities or the emerging markets would satisfy almost all eight.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1

Of cobras, newspapers and the Manchurian incident

Forget the Taiwan issue and China Sea disputes with Japan, the biggest threat to national security for the Chinese people went largely unnoticed last week: 160 illegally bred king cobra snakes escaped captivity from a farm on the outskirts of Beijing.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Serving the servants: politics is hampering national wealth management

Poor communication and differing incentives between politicians and national wealth managers are undermining performance, argues global head of official institutions at BNP Paribas Investment Partners, Gary Smith. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous