Real estate and infrastructure shine in private markets

Real estate and infrastructure are attractive investments in the private markets space, but individual investment selection has become more important in private equity and debt, according to the latest major analysis by global private markets investment management firm Partners Group.

The analysis, part of a six-monthly series, continues to favour emerging markets, on a geographical split, as being best positioned for the post-crisis global economy.

Partners Group says: “Over the past six months there has been considerable speculation as to the directional movement of the real estate markets. For the next 12 to 18 months (the firm) has a strong conviction that the tide not only is coming in, it is coming in far faster than many believe.

“Investors’ salient questions are: ‘where will new capital invest in real estate?’, ‘what are the opportunities?’ and ‘where can the savvy investor find the best risk-adjusted returns?’

Nori Lietz, partner and chief strategist for private real estate at Partners Group, says: “We think the herd mentality will cause many investors to invest in core ‘trophy’ properties. Our view is that more sophisticated investors will search for those opportunities which remain capital constrained, including investments in secondaries, debt recapitalizations and emerging market real estate.”

The report says there is an estimated $ 180 billion of dry powder for private real estate investment after the “window shopping” of the past three years, and that this may be an understatement. Notwithstanding the abundant capital available for trophy assets (such as large new or landmark office blocks), little is presently available for distressed situations.

Sponsored Content

Geographically for real estate, Partners Group currently favours emerging markets, especially Brazil, over Europe and then North America.

In unlisted infrastructure, entry valuations are very important because it is a classic value asset class. This is because there are usually only a limited number of operational levers which can compensate if a high entry price is paid.

Michael Barben, partner and head of private infrastructure at  Partners Group, says: “The relative scarcity of capital in the infrastructure space consequently offers today’s investor the advantage of attractive valuations and limited competition for transactions.”

The report notes that the infrastructure market seems to be moving away from the “captive” or “sponsored” funds, which may have perceived conflicts of interests, and towards the specialist managers.

With respect to private equity and debt, timing is very important and the current cycle makes investment selection of paramount importance.

The report says the industry currently has an estimated $400 billion of dry powder for equity in buyouts and some managers will be pressured to invest because of the low level of activity of the past two years. Pricing on transactions has bounced back, particularly at the big end. The firm sees better opportunities among small-medium-sized companies. It also currently favours direct investments over primary funds and the secondaries market.

Similarly with private debt, the firm is focusing more on direct investments as the low-hanging fruit from distressed sellers has already been picked. However, the positive outlook for private debt lenders in general is supported by less competition, particularly from the banks, but also from some managers being unable to raise capital.

“Over the past two years, fund-raising has become more difficult,” the report says. “Only high-quality funds that managed to generate strong track records throughout the crisis are able to come back to the market.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous