Performance-based pay should be abolished: ICGN

Non-executive directors’ pay should consist solely of a combination of a cash retainer and equity-based remuneration, according to the International Corporate Governance Network’s new guidelines for non-executive director pay crafted over the past several years in consultation with, and on behalf of, many of the largest global shareowners.

Executive director of ICGN, Carl Rosen, said among the agreed-upon themes were that non-executive director equity remuneration should be immediately vested and not performance-based. ICGN also has a preference against the use of options.

The cornerstone of non-executive director remuneration should be alignment of interest through the attainment of significant equity holdings in the company meaningful to each individual director, according to the guidelines.

Key aspects of the guidelines include placing an emphasis on non-executive alignment of interest with long-term owners; opposing the use of performance-based remuneration for non-executive directors; clear disclosure and the establishment of ownership guidelines; and some flexibility for companies to implement the principles in ways consistent with their unique circumstances.

It also says that non-executive directors should not be eligible for retirement benefits.

The ICGN is a not-for-profit body with members from more than 45 countries representing funds under management of about $9.5 trillion.

Sponsored Content

To access the guidelines click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Warren Buffett’s excellent adventure

'Youngster’ Warren Buffett (85) rebuffed risks from sugar and climate change as he toured the American economy with his ‘older’ offsider, Charlie Munger (92), presenting at the Berkshire Hathaway AGM .

Pay for performance

Pension fund executive pay varies widely around the globe, with differences based on internal management and alternatives exposures. Amanda White examines pension fund executive pay.

A long way to go

It’s all very well to have diversity, but most people lack the tools for how to get the best out of a diverse team. Instead the reverse is true and diversity can lead to an unlevel playing field.

Too much of a good thing

Experts at the Thinking Ahead Institute outline the pitfalls of implementing team diversity, , when too much diversity fails us, and how organisations can be champions for change.

Income the key dimension

Risk should be defined as the inability to meet retirement income goals, so investors and their managers should forget alpha and other “distractions”, according to David Booth.

Worlds colliding

The debate about the effect of pay inequality on both the financial and real-world markets is about to get a whole lot hotter this year.

Previous