NYSTRS leaves UNPRI but remains committed to governance

The New York State Teachers Retirement System has voluntarily withdrawn active participation in the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) initiative but will continue to support strong corporate governance principles through memberships in the Council of Institutional Investors and Ceres.

Executive director of PRI, James Gifford, acknowledged that the reporting requirements for UNPRI were quite onerous requiring a certain degree of internal resources, however a spokesman for NYSTRS, John Cardillo, would not confirm this was the reason for leaving.

Five signatories were also delisted in the past year because they were unable to complete the annual reporting and assessment, which is a minimum condition of remaining a signatory. They were DESBAN, Christopher Reynolds Foundation, Foresters Community Finance, Oasis Group Holdings and Trinity Holdings.

Rapaki Property Group and MMA also voluntarily left in the past year.

Members of the US-based Council of Institutional Investors include large, mid-size and small public, union and
corporate pension funds with combined assets that exceed $3 trillion.

Sponsored Content

The Ceres is a coalition of investor groups, environmental organisations and investment funds that engage directly with companies on environmental and social issues.

Other funds have left the PRI in the past, including Infinity, Scoris and Conscious Capital, with a PRI spokesperson citing organisational change as the most common reason.

There are now 573 signatories to PRI, including 182 asset owners, 282 investment managers and 109 professional service partners – with 93 new signatories in the past year.

The PRI initiative will consult with its signatories in the next year regarding the transparency framework, which will become part of the mandatory reporting and assessment process from 2011.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

European distressed debt: investors divided by volatility

Last month conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com hosted a thinktank with a group of influential Australian investors to discuss the opportunities in European distressed debt. Participants included the Australian Government’s $80 billion sovereign wealth Future Fund, the $68 billion QIC, and leading asset consultants, with guest speaker sir David Cooksey, former board member of the Bank of England, chairman

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Previous