NYSTRS leaves UNPRI but remains committed to governance

The New York State Teachers Retirement System has voluntarily withdrawn active participation in the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UNPRI) initiative but will continue to support strong corporate governance principles through memberships in the Council of Institutional Investors and Ceres.

Executive director of PRI, James Gifford, acknowledged that the reporting requirements for UNPRI were quite onerous requiring a certain degree of internal resources, however a spokesman for NYSTRS, John Cardillo, would not confirm this was the reason for leaving.

Five signatories were also delisted in the past year because they were unable to complete the annual reporting and assessment, which is a minimum condition of remaining a signatory. They were DESBAN, Christopher Reynolds Foundation, Foresters Community Finance, Oasis Group Holdings and Trinity Holdings.

Rapaki Property Group and MMA also voluntarily left in the past year.

Members of the US-based Council of Institutional Investors include large, mid-size and small public, union and
corporate pension funds with combined assets that exceed $3 trillion.

Sponsored Content

The Ceres is a coalition of investor groups, environmental organisations and investment funds that engage directly with companies on environmental and social issues.

Other funds have left the PRI in the past, including Infinity, Scoris and Conscious Capital, with a PRI spokesperson citing organisational change as the most common reason.

There are now 573 signatories to PRI, including 182 asset owners, 282 investment managers and 109 professional service partners – with 93 new signatories in the past year.

The PRI initiative will consult with its signatories in the next year regarding the transparency framework, which will become part of the mandatory reporting and assessment process from 2011.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous